ANOOP CHITKARA
Parvinder Singh Alias Parminder Singh Alias Parry – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
12 | 6.2.2021 | Chhajli, District Sangrur | 341/323/307/34 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act and Section 325 IPC (added later on) |
1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.
2. As per bail application and paragraph 9 of the status report of the State, the petitioner has following criminal history:-
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 18 | 28.1.2021 | 382 IPC | City Sangrur |
2. | 11 | 15.1.2021 | 307, 148, 149 IPC | Sadar Mansa |
3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner be granted bail with a condition that in case he repeats the offence, such bail would be cancelled.
4. Ld. counsel appearing for the State contends that the petitioner acted in furtherance of common intention and does not deserve bail. Ld. counsel opposes the bail also because the petitioner has criminal antecedents, and bail encourages habitual offenders.
REASONING:
5. In Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P., (2012) 3 SCC 382, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[10] It is not in dispute and highlighted that the second respondent is a sitting Mem
Aparna Bhatt vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P.
The discretion of the judge in granting bail, the need for judicious consideration of bail petitions, and the imposition of stringent conditions to prevent misuse of bail.
The court can grant bail with stringent conditions based on the criminal antecedents and nature of allegations, ensuring compliance and preventing influence on the investigation or intimidation of wi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider the accused's criminal history, the gravity of the offence, and the possibility of influencing the investigation and intimidat....
The court's discretion in granting bail must consider the accused's criminal history and the necessity of imposing stringent conditions to prevent further criminal activities.
The court must judiciously consider bail petitions, imposing stringent conditions to address concerns of influencing the investigation, tampering with evidence, and intimidating witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court in granting bail, the need for judicious consideration of bail petitions, and the imposition of stringent conditions to....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of judiciously considering various circumstances and legal provisions related to bail in granting bail to an accused with a criminal....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the court to act judiciously with reasonableness when considering bail for an accused with a criminal history, and the imposition of s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.