ANOOP CHITKARA
Sumit Deswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 83 | 21.04.2022 | Kharar, District SAS Nagar | 323, 342, 324, 379, 506, 148, 149 IPC 1860 (section 307 and 427 IPC added later on) |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondents.
4. On 1-8-2022, the aggrieved persons Gaurav (R-2), Ramandeep Sngh (R-3), Sahil (R-4), and Aurav (R-5) appeared before the JMIC Kharar that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. Even the accused appeared and sought the quashing of FIR based on compromise. As per the concerned court's repor
Dimpey Gujraj v Union Territory
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
Ram Prasad v State of Uttar Pradesh
Shakuntala Sawhney v Kaushalya Sawhney
State of M.P. v. Rajveer Singh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kalyan Singh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan & others
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.