Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Darshan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 28 | 25.02.2016 | Tanda, Distt. Hoshiarpur | 307, 323, 506, 328, 511 & 34 IPC |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-4.
3. After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondent.
4. On 28-01-2020, the aggrieved person Paramjit Kaur, (R-2) appeared through her power of attorney, before the JMIC Dasuya, who on her behalf stated that there would be no objection if the Court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. Even the accused petitioner made a similar statement about the matter having been compromised. As per the concerned court's report dated 4-2-2020, the part
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the nature of the offence, societal impact, and the possibility of conviction while exercising the power under Sectio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise, absence of coercion or threat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court can exercise its inherent power under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences, considering the ....
The court emphasized the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence and the need to secure the ends of justice in exercising the inherent power for quashing the proceedings based on a compromise.
The High Court can quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if a genuine compromise exists and public interest is not adversely affected.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to exercise the power under Section 482 of the Code sparingly and with caution, especially for heinous and serious offences, and to consid....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principles for quashing criminal proceedings based on compromise, considering the nature of the offences, societal impact, and the possibility ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 of CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
