Judgment

Mr. Namit Kumar, J.

The present Civil Revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 10.01.2023 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sonepat whereby the application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 18 Rule 17 read with 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short CPC) for additional evidence was dismissed.

2. In brief the facts of the present case are that plaintiff Late Shiv Raj Singh filed a suit against his son Ajay Chaudhary and Daughter-in-law Rajesh for declaration and permanent injunction to the effect that agreement to sell dated 21.07.2011 is illegal, wrong, null and void. The defendants while filing the written statement filed counter claim seeking relief of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 21.07.2011 with the consequential relief of permanent injunction. Thereafter respondents/plaintiffs led their evidence and after culmination of evidence of plaintiffs, the defendants led their evidence and during evidence petitioners/defendants filed an application for comparison of signature of plaintiff and production of sale deed etc which was allowed by Ld. Civil Ju