IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA, J.
Pramender Singh Sehrawat – Petitioner
Versus
Kamal Kanta Verma & Anr. – Respondents
CR-3991 of 2022
Decided On : 28-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction petition filed for non-payment of rent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner admits tenancy but cites covid-19 as reason for non-payment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments over inability to pay due to pandemic impact. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis of petitioner’s non-payment and eviction orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. discussion on granting extensions for rent payment during pandemic. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. equitable considerations in rental disputes during extraordinary circumstances. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. conduct of petitioner disqualifies from equitable relief. (Para 16) |
| 8. orders of eviction upheld; petition dismissed. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid at the instance of petitioner-tenant to the eviction orders dated 21.04.2022 and 08.09.2022 passed by the courts below, arising out of the proceedings initiated at the instance of respondents-landlord, seeking eviction on the grounds of arrears of rent.
2. The facts of the present case are that the respondents-landlord filed an eviction petition invoking Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (for short, "1973 Act") against petitioner-tenant for eviction from the tenanted premises bearing No.206, 2nd floor, Time Square Building, Sushant Lok, Phase- 1, Gurugram, measuring 3129 Square feet, on the ground of non-payment of arrears of rent. It was pleaded in the eviction petition that the tenanted premises was rented out in favour of petitioner-tenant vide lease deed dated 03.02.2020, for a period of 12 years with rent @ Rs. 2,12,772/- per month, besides the payment of GST. A period of four months was given as a free period (i.e. 03.02.2020 to 05.06.2020) to the petitioner-tenant for the purpose of setting up of his machinery etc. Since, the arrears of rent were not being paid, respondents-landlord filed an eviction petition on 07.07.2021 against petitioner-tenant on account of non-payment of rent w.e.f. 16.06.2020 to July, 2021, besides non-payment of GST & maintenance charges.
3. The petitioner filed his written statement before the learned Rent Controller on 25.10.2021, admitting the tenancy as well as the execution of lease deed, including the rate of rent, though submitted that the non-payment of rent was on account of Covid-19 pandemic. Learned Rent Controller vide its order dated 06.04.2022 made provisional assessment of rent by directing the petitioner-tenant to tender rent amounting to Rs. 34,44,138/- on or before 21.04.2022. Admittedly, order dated 06.04.2022 was never challenged by the petitioner who even failed to deposit the arrears of rent thereby resulting into an ejectment order dated 21.04.2022, passed by the learned Rent Controller. Aggrieved thereof, the petitioner-tenant filed first appeal before the appellate authority on 01.06.2022, however, the same was also dismissed vide order dated 08.09.2022. It is the aforesaid two orders, which have been impugned by way of present revision petition.
4. Notice of motion was issued by this Court vide order dated 19.09.2022, which reads as under:-
Dalip Kaur Brar v. M/s Guru Granth Sahib Sewa Mission
Dharam Vir v. Raj Kumar Book Binder
Namdeo Lokman Lodhi v. Narmadabai
R.S. Lala Praduman Kumar v. Virendra Goyal (dead) by his Lrs.
A tenant's failure to deposit assessed rent on time under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 leads to automatic eviction, with no provision for extending the payment deadline.
The failure of a tenant to comply with a Rent Controller's order for provisional rent assessment necessitates eviction, as the Controller has no jurisdiction to extend the payment period.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to extend the period for tendering the provisionally assessed arrears of rent, and failure to comply w....
Court confirms that a tenant's good faith intent to pay addresses eviction liability if the Rent Controller fails to accurately assess due rent, emphasizing fair enforcement of the law.
A tenant's failure to deposit assessed provisional rent mandates eviction under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1976.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.