SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J.
X – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 4885 of 2024 (O&M)
Decided On : 11-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Shehbaz Thind, Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Mr. Jagraj Singh, Mr. Buta Singh, Mr. Rishabh Bajaj, and Ms. Sanjana Makkar, Advocates; For the Petitioner
Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate, (Amicus Curiae).
Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab with Mr. Aditya Sharda, DAG, Punjab.

The court affirmed that the right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21 applies equally to unmarried women, allowing them to seek termination of pregnancy under changing circumstances.

Headnote:(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21 of the Constitution - Petitioner, an 18-year-old, sought permission for termination of pregnancy after 24 weeks due to social stigma and mental distress - Court emphasized the importance of reproductive choices and recognized the need for judicial interpretation to extend rights to unmarried women - Medical Board recommended continuation of pregnancy, citing risks of pre-term delivery and neonatal complications - Court ultimately directed for institutional delivery and potential adoption of the child, while maintaining the petitioner's privacy. (Paras 1, 10, 24, 30, 39)

(B) Right to privacy and dignity - Court reiterated that a woman's right to make reproductive choices is a dimension of personal liberty under Article 21, and emphasized the need for legal recognition of unmarried women's rights in reproductive matters. (Paras 21, 28, 29)

Judgement Key Points

What is the extent of a woman's right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21 with respect to unmarried women seeking termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks?

What is the appropriate interpretation of Section 3 and Rule 3B of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and 2003 in relation to termination of pregnancy for unmarried women and changes in material circumstances?

What are the permissible Court-directed remedies when medical boards recommend continuation of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks or when termination is denied, including adoption or state-facilitated delivery?


JUDGMENT

Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.

Considering the nature of the case and the future prospects in the life of the young girl who is the petitioner before this Court, Registry is directed to conceal the identity of the petitioner and carry out appropriate steps to hide the details that would disclose or reveal her identity. For the facility of reference, the petitioner shall be referred to as 'X' and the case title be recorded as 'X' v. State of Punjab and others.

2. The present writ petition had been filed on 29.02.2024 for seeking directions to the doctors at Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, to carry out termination of pregnancy of the petitioner by constituting a Medical Board.

3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner whose date of birth is (dd/mm/yy) and aged about 18 years 7 months, met a boy around an year ago and they fell in love with each other. As a result of their growing proximity, they entered into physical relations with each other but both of them parted ways later. Petitioner is a student of 12th Standard and during her ongoing Board examinations, she felt pain in her abdomen for which she was diagnosed by the doctors of Rajindra Hospital, Patiala to be pregnant. Petitioner is under immense pressure for having conceived a child when she herself is of tender age and is a student appearing in her 10+2 Board Examinations. She is apprehensive that her entire career and future prospects shall suffer a huge set back in case the pregnancy is not permitted to be terminated at this stage. She is herself of a tender age and is not mentally prepared to give birth. The unwanted pregnancy shall subject her to enhanced social stigma and incarceration. A prayer is thus made for being granted permission for termination of the pregnancy by relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Suchita Srivastava and another v. Chandigarh Administration, reported as (2009) 9 SCC 1. The relevant part of the judgment is extracted as under:-

"There is no doubt that a woman's right to make reproductive choices is also a dimension of 'personal liberty' as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is important to recognise that reproductive choices can be exercised to procreate as well as to abstain from procreating. The crucial consideration is that a woman's right to privacy, dignity and bodily integrity should be respected. This means that there should be no restriction whatsoever on the exercise of reproductive choices such as a woman's right to refuse participation in sexual activity or alternatively the insistence on use of contraceptive methods. Furthermore, women are also free to choose birth-control methods such as undergoing sterilisation procedures. Taken to their logical conclusion, reproductive rights include a woman's entitlement to carry a pregnancy to its full term, to give birth and to subsequently raise children."

4. Considering that a legal issue is involved as to whether the permission for termination of the pregnancy can be granted at this juncture or not, counsel for the respondent-State made a statement that there is no need to file reply and that they shall advance arguments on the petition itself. Additionally, Sh. Vivek Saini, Advocate was also appointed as Amicus by this Court to assist in the matter.

5. When the matter came up for preliminary hearing, vide order dated 29.02.2024, the respondent-State of Punjab was directed to constitute a Medical Board to carry out physical examination of the petitioner and submit its report as regards the mental, physical and psychological status of the petitioner.

6. The petitioner appeared before the said Medical Board and a report was received from the Centre Administrator. The same is extracted as under:-

"Counseling Report-On Dated 04-03-2024, the girl (name concealed) and the girl's father (name concealed) came to the Sakhi one stop Centre, Patiala for counseling as per the order case No.CWP-4885-2024 of the Hon'ble Punjab an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top