SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, JJ.
Harpreet Kaur – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
LPA-612 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 09-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Ms.Sonia G.Singh, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Ms.Divya Godara, Advocate for Respondent No.5.

The date of passing an examination takes precedence over the date of issuance of the certificate for recruitment eligibility, ensuring meritorious candidates are not penalized for procedural delays.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment - Consideration of Date of Passing vs. Date of Issuance of Certificate - The court held that recruitment agencies should prioritize the date of passing of the examination over the date of issuance of the certificate, especially in cases of procedural delays due to financial hardships. (Paras 11, 12, 17, 18)

(B) Procedural Lapses - The court emphasized that meritorious candidates should not be penalized for procedural delays in document issuance, advocating for a fair consideration of qualifications based on actual performance. (Paras 12, 14, 16)

Facts of the case:
The appellant-petitioner, despite securing 98 marks in the examination, was denied appointment due to the late issuance of her B.Ed certificate, which was received after the cut-off date for submission.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the date of passing the examination should be the relevant factor for recruitment, not the date of certificate issuance, and that procedural delays should not disadvantage deserving candidates.

Issues: The main issue was whether the date of passing the examination or the date of issuance of the certificate should be considered for recruitment eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that recruitment agencies must consider the date of passing the examination, as procedural delays should not hinder the appointment of meritorious candidates.

Result: The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were directed to issue an appointment letter to the appellant-petitioner forthwith.

JUDGMENT

Sudeepti Sharma, J.

The present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) is filed against the order dated 15.02.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No.3102 of 2023, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant-petitioner herein for quashing of the provisional select list of Science Master cadre prepared on 16.12.2022 by the respondents was dismissed.

Brief Facts of The Case

2. Brief facts of the case are that, the appellant-petitioner appeared in the two years B.Ed Course for the session 2015 to 2017. Online provisional result for 4th Semester dated 06.03.2017 was shown as 'RLR/Pass' which means that there is some technical defect in the registration of the appellant with the University. The State of Punjab issued an advertisement dated 08.01.2022 inviting applications to fill the backlog as well new vacancies under various posts of Master cadre. Since the appellant was possessing B.Sc., B.Ed. degrees, she applied for Master Cadre (Science) in General category, and was issued Roll Number as well. The relevant portion of Educational qualification for the subject of Science as per advertisement is as under: -

    "Educational Qualification

    Subject of Science

    a) Science (Non Medical)

    (i) Should have passed B.Sc. with 45% marks in the case of General Category candidates and 40% marks in the case of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, Backward Classes and Physical Handicapped Candidates from a recognized university or institution with any of the two subjects i.e. physics Chemistry and Mathematics or should have passed B.Sc. in Physics and Mathematics or any other equivalent qualification, but certificate of equivalency should be given by the concerned University as per guidelines of the University Grants Commission; and

    (ii) Should have passed B.Ed from a recognized university or institution with Science as one of the teaching subject as per guidelines of the University Grants Commission.

    b) Science (Medical)

    (1) Should have passed B.Sc. with 45% marks in the case of General Category candidates and 40% marks in the case of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, Backward Classes and Physical Handicapped Candidates from a recognized university or institution with any of the two subjects i.e. Biology, Physics and Chemistry or B.Sc. Honours) in either of these subjects or B.Sc (life science) or B.Sc (Physical Science) or B.Sc (Bio-technology) or B.Sc (Honours) or B.Sc (Industrial Microbiology) or B.Sc (Micro-biology) or B.Sc (Bio-physics) or B.Sc (Bio-chemistry) or B.Sc (Microbial, Food Technology, Chemistry) or B.Sc. Industrial Chemistry or B.Sc. Food Science and Quality Control or B.Sc. Microbial food Technology any other equivalent qualification, but certificate of equivalency should be given by the concerned University as per guidelines of the University Grants Commission; and

    (ii) Should have passed B.Ed from a recognized university or institution with Science as one of the teaching subject as per guidelines of the University Grants Commission."

3. The last date for submission of the applications was 30.01.2022 as per the advertisement which was later on extended to 15.05.2022, and the appellant appeared in the written examination and secured 98 marks out of 150. Vide letter dated 22.11.2022, all the candidates who secured 85 marks and above, were called for scrutiny of original documents. Since the appellant-petitioner was not called for scrutiny of documents despite the fact that she secured more marks than the cut-off marks, therefore, she made a representation to the authority concerned which was not replied to.

4. A perusal of the record shows that the appellant-petitioner submitted a representation to the department concerned, stating therein that due to financial hardship and serious illness of her father, she was unable to pay the requisite fee to obtain her certificate from University. Though the result was declared on 06.09.2017 and she was declared pass in the same

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top