Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Randhir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbhajan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Aggarwal, J. (Oral)
1. For, the issue involved is identical in both the above mentioned cases, they shall be disposed of by way of a common judgment. The facts are primarily being derived from CR No.3083 of 2024, titled as Randhir Singh and others Vs. Harbhajan Singh and another.
2. The present revision petition is directed against order dated 25.04.2024, passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Yamunanagar, vide which the prayer made by the petitioners-defendants for stay of operation of the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Yamunanagar was declined and at the same time it was observed that in case the respondents-plaintiffs decide to cut and remove the trees standing over the suit land, they would render proper accounts in the trial Court.
3. A suit was filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for declaration to the effect that the entries in the column of Jamabandi regarding gair marusi in favour of the ancestors of the appellants-defendants were wrong and illegal and that the respondents-plaintiffs were not bound by the same and for permanent injunction restraining the appellants-defendants from int
The ownership of trees belongs to the landowners and not the planters.
The burden of proof lies with the Plaintiff to establish exclusive possession of the land in a case involving damage to property.
[The court established that land declared as protected forest under the Indian Forest Act cannot be claimed by individuals without valid title, and that any prior claims based on unregistered documen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
