SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2492

B.S.CHAUHAN, R.C.PANDEY
SHAILENDRA KUMAR OJHA AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Yogesh Agarwal

B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned advertisement dated 22nd october, 2003 (Annexure-2) and the preceding Government Order dated 27th September, 2003 (Annexure-3), providing for appointment of D. G. C. (Criminal) and Additional Government advocate in District Ballia.

( 2 ) FACTS and circumstances, giving rise to this case are that petitioners No. 1 to 4 were appointed as Assistant District Government Counsel (Criminal), vide order dated 27th July, 1992 and petitioner No. 5 as Additional Government Advocate vide order dated 3rd August, 1992 in district Ballia (Annexures-4 and 5), for a period of one year, i. e. , upto 31st July, 1993. Their appointment had been renewed from time to time. Last renewal was made on 30th October, 2000 for a period of three years, i. e. , upto 29th October, 2003 by the State Government. Instead of renewing the cases of the petitioners, an advertisement dated 22nd October, 2003 (Annexure-2)has been issued in pursuance of the Government Order dated 27th September, 2003 (Annexure-3) inviting applications for the said post under Para 7. 03 of the U. P. Legal remembrancer Manual (hereinafter called the l. R. Man





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top