Back
DILIP B. BHOSALE, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
BUNDEL KHAND ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.—The first writ petition (Writ-C No. 35910 of 2017), under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by one Bundelkhand Advertising Association (for short, ‘the Association’) and its members, whereas the second writ petition (Writ-C No. 32507 of 2017) is filed by M/s. Anoop Publicity alone, who is also a member of the Association. The prayers made in both the writ petitions and factual matrix against which they are arising are similar. Even the respondents in both the writ petitions are common. Hence both the writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
1.1 In the first writ petition, initially the petitioners had challenged the order dated 27th July 2017, whereby their applications seeking renewal of permissions for displaying advertisements for the years 2016-17 and 2017-18 made under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 (for short, ‘the Act’) were rejected. The petitioners, by way of an amendment, also raised a challenge to the order dated 20th October 2016 passed by respondent No. 8, another order dated 20th October 2016 passed by respondent No. 3/4 and the agre
The importance of fair and reasonable actions by the State, the need for public auction in granting state largesse, and the significance of complying with the terms and conditions of agreements.
Lowest bidder has no vested right to contract; authority may cancel tender for valid reasons like cartel without malice; tender conditions not judicially reviewable unless arbitrary.
Judicial review in contractual matters is limited to evaluating decision-making processes and does not extend to substituting the authority's decisions unless clear evidence of arbitrariness or mala ....
Point of Law : when a bidder who has not been issued the final acceptance of the bid by the competent authority being the highest bidder acquires no vested right ,but the bidder has right to equality....
(1) Disputes arising out of purely contractual obligations cannot be entertained by High Court in exercise of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.(2) A wrong doer ought not to be permitted to make profi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
