SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Sudhir Agarwal, Virendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ.
Prakati Rai And Others - Appellants
Vs.
State of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ - C No. 29495 of 2018, 29547 of 2018, 30884 of 2018, 40395 of 2018, 40399 of 2018, 40401 of 2018
Decided On : 31-10-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Kartikeya Saran, Adv., Anand Prakash Paul, Adv., Brij Bhushan Paul, Adv., Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Adv., Tarun Agrawal, Adv., Ravi Kant Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv., Nimai Das, Adv., Sudhanshu Srivastava, Adv., Amit Verma, Adv., Harihar Prasad Srivastava, Adv., Devi Prasad Mishra, Adv., Ram Chandra Tripathi, Adv., Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv., M.D. Singh Shekhar, Adv., Rajmani Yadav, Adv.

The court held that mere possession post-lease expiration does not confer legal rights over Nazul land, allowing State government to resume property for public purposes under existing laws.

Headnote:(A) Government Grants Act, 1895 - Repeal Act, 2017 - Nazul Land Management - Dispute related to Nazul Plot No. 21/17 - Allegations of unauthorized occupation and lack of valid lease by appellants - Court found that appellants did not possess valid lease after 1986 and could be evicted without statutory procedures required under Act, 1972, as rights were governed by terms of lease-deed established from original grantee. (Paras 4, 174-240)

(B) Rights of Appellants - The court determined that possession without formal recognition post-expiration of lease constituted unauthorized occupation, not enhancing any rights over the Nazul land. (Paras 181-238)

(C) Public Purpose - Resumption of land for group housing is in public interest, sanctioned by law, justifying the eviction notices served to appellants. (Paras 174, 227-228)

Table of Content
1. collective rights over nazul land (Para 2 , 4)
2. procedure for renewal and conversion of lease (Para 6 , 10 , 14)
3. applicability of legal principles and government policy (Para 8 , 9)
4. state's discretion in resuming nazul land (Para 28 , 124)
5. final direction for eviction and policy review (Para 238 , 240)

JUDGMENT :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

All these writ petitions relate to Nazul Plot No. 21/17, Chikatpur, Nasibpur Bakhtiyari, Allahabad, area 11906 square meter, and, therefore they are being decided by this common judgment. However, for better understanding, it would be appropriate to refer brief facts stated by petitioners in different writ petitions, separately.

    Writ Petition No. 29495 of 2018

2. Writ Petition No. 29495 of 2018 (hereinafter referred to as "WP-1") has been filed by seven petitioners, namely, Smt. Prakati Rai, Smt. Sangita Shukla, Smt. Vandana Rai, Smt. Rachna Rai, Km. Shakti Saran Singh, Km. Samapika Saran Singh and Km. Shivangi Saran Singh, daughters of late Sureshwari Saran Singh, praying for issue of a writ of certiorari quashing notice/order dated 14.08.2018 (Annexure-13 to writ petition) passed by District Magistrate, Allahabad and also State Government's order dated 19.06.2018, published in official gazette dated 09.08.2018. Petitioners have also sought a writ of mandamus commanding respondent-authorities to consider petitioners' application dated 30.01.1999 for grant of freehold rights over property in dispute in accordance with law and to restrain Respondents-1, 2 and 3 from evicting petitioners from property in dispute.

3. A lease in respect of Nazul land, Bungalow No. 17, Thornhill Road, area 2 acres and 4561 sq. yards was executed by Governor of United Provinces in favour of Rai Bahadur Bindeshwari Saran Singh on 22.04.1890 with effect from 01.10.1886, for a period of 50 years, on monthly rent of Rs. 90/-. A renewal Lease Instrument was executed for a further period of 50 years commencing from 01.10.1936 in favour of Sureshwari Saran Singh, Jagdambika Saran Singh, Brijeshwari Saran Singh and Badreshawari Saran Singh on the same terms as stated in original lease deed dated 22.04.1890. Sri Bindeshwari Saran Singh died in 1942. After his death, property in dispute devolved upon his four sons namely, Maheshwari Saran Singh, Jagdishwari Saran Singh, Bisheshwari Saran Singh and Jagdambika Saran Singh and each got 1/4 share. Maheshwari Saran Singh died on 15.2.1960 and his son Sureshwari Saran Singh died on 28.05.1979. His wife Smt. Smriti Saran Singh moved an application on 06.02.1995 for mutation of her name in place of late Sureshwari Saran Singh in respect of plot in dispute alongwith her daughters, i.e., petitioners. Reminders were given on 01.05.1995, 05.07.1995, 06.07.1995, 14.07.1995, 03.08.1995, 19.04.1996 and 09.06.1998. District Magistrate, Allahabad made an inquiry and found family tree of Sri Bindeshwari Saran Singh as under:

Siddh Narain Singh

Bindeshwari Sharan Singh

(Died on 27.10.42)

Maheshwari Saran Singh

(Died on 15.02.60)

(Wife Smt. Ratenshwari )

Bhuvneshwari Saran Singh (Died in 1929)

(Wife Smt. Rukmani)

(Issueless)

Bishweshari Saran Singh (Died on 18.11.43)

(Wife Smt. Lalita Kunwari)

Jagdishwari Saran Singh (Died on 01.03.44)

(Wife Smt. Annapurna)

(Issueless)

Jagdambika Saran Singh

Jagdambika Saran Singh

(Died on 03.10.84)

(Wife Smt. Maheshwari)

Sureshwari Saran Singh

(died on 28.05.79)

(Wife Smt. Smriti Saran Singh)

Shanker Prasad

Prakash Narain

Chandrashekhar

Brijeshwari Saran Singh

Brijeshwari Saran Singh

(Wife Smt. Pushpa Devi)

(Daughter Sandya Singh) (P in WP-4)

Badreswari Saran Singh

(Died on 14.09.07)

(Wife Kumud Singh) (P in WP-3)

Akash Saran Singh alias Lov Mandeshwari Saran Singh (P in WP-2)

Mandleshwari Saran Singh

Sarveshwari Saran Singh

(P in WP 5 & 6)

                                              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                              1
                                              2
                                              3
                                              4
                                              5
                                              6
                                              7
                                              8
                                              9
                                              10
                                              11
                                              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                              supreme today icon
                                              logo-black

                                              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                              Please visit our Training & Support
                                              Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                              qr

                                              Scan Me!

                                              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                              whatsapp-icon Back to top