Prakati Rai vs State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 1975

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(All) 1975

SUDHIR AGARWAL
Prakati Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Kartikeya Saran, Adv., Anand Prakash Paul, Adv., Brij Bhushan Paul, Adv., Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Adv., Tarun Agrawal, Adv., Ravi Kant Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv., Nimai Das, Adv., Sudhanshu Srivastava, Adv., Amit Verma, Adv., Harihar Prasad Srivastava, Adv., Devi Prasad Mishra, Adv., Ram Chandra Tripathi, Adv., Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv., M.D. Singh Shekhar, Adv., Rajmani Yadav, Adv.

Table of Content
1. collective rights over nazul land (Para 2 , 4)
2. procedure for renewal and conversion of lease (Para 6 , 10 , 14)
3. applicability of legal principles and government policy (Para 8 , 9)
4. state's discretion in resuming nazul land (Para 28 , 124)
5. final direction for eviction and policy review (Para 238 , 240)

JUDGMENT :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

All these writ petitions relate to Nazul Plot No. 21/17, Chikatpur, Nasibpur Bakhtiyari, Allahabad, area 11906 square meter, and, therefore they are being decided by this common judgment. However, for better understanding, it would be appropriate to refer brief facts stated by petitioners in different writ petitions, separately.

Writ Petition No. 29495 of 2018

2. Writ Petition No. 29495 of 2018 (hereinafter referred to as "WP-1") has been filed by seven petitioners, namely, Smt. Prakati Rai, Smt. Sangita Shukla, Smt. Vandana Rai, Smt. Rachna Rai, Km. Shakti Saran Singh, Km. Samapika Saran Singh and Km. Shivangi Saran Singh, daughters of late Sureshwari Saran Singh, praying for issue of a writ of certiorari quashing notice/order d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(All) 1975

SUDHIR AGARWALPrakati Rai – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (46)

SUDHIR AGARWAL
Prakati Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent