IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
Mohammad Azam Khan And Others – Applicant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Opposite Party
Application U/s 482 No. 39535 of 2019
Decided On : 07-02-2020
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 – Petition filed to quash the charge-sheet cognizance taking order summoning order as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., arising out of Case Crime pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Held, Veracity of the depositions made by the witnesses is a question of trial and need not be determined at the time of framing of charge- Appreciation of evidence on merit is to be done by the court only after the charges have been framed and the trial has commenced- For the purpose of framing of charge the court needs to prima facie determine that there exists sufficient material for the commencement of trial – Perusal of the F.I.R. and the material collected by the Investigating Officer on the basis of which the charge sheet has been submitted makes out a prima facie case against the accused at this stage and there appear to be sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused – Prayer for quashing the impugned charge-sheet as well as the proceedings of the entire proceedings of the aforesaid State case are refused – Petition rejected. (Paras 71 to 73)
Facts of the Case
One Mr. Akash Saxena, who is alleged to be Regional Convener has made an application before the Station House Officer, under Section 154 Cr.P.C. for lodging of first information report against Mohd. Azam Khan, Smt. Danjin Fatima/Tanjim Fatma, which has been registered on the same day by creating a code and plotting a well-planned conspiracy, for personal interest, had got issued two date of birth certificates of their son, namely, Abdullah Azam Khan, son of Mohd. Azam Khan, resident of Gher Meer Baaj Kha, Jail Road, Rampur of two different districts.
Finding of the Court
Veracity of the depositions made by the witnesses is a question of trial and need not be determined at the time of framing of charge- Appreciation of evidence on merit is to be done by the court only after the charges have been framed and the trial has commenced- For the purpose of framing of charge the court needs to prima facie determine that there exists sufficient material for the commencement of trial – Perusal of the F.I.R. and the material collected by the Investigating Officer on the basis of which the charge sheet has been submitted makes out a prima facie case against the accused at this stage and there appear to be sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused – Prayer for quashing the impugned charge-sheet as well as the proceedings of the entire proceedings of the aforesaid State case are refused.
Result: Petition rejected.
JUDGMENT :
1. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 1st April, 2019, cognizance taking order dated 19th August, 2019, summoning order dated 19th August, 2019 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1453 of 2019 (State Vs. Mohd. Azam Khan & Others) under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., arising out of Case Crime No. 04 of 2019, Police Station-Ganj, District-Rampur pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Rampur.
2. Perused the material available on record.
3. I have heard Mr. Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Saiful Islam Siddiqui, Mr. S. Safdar Ali Kazmi and Mrs. Tahira Kazmi, learned counsel appearing for the applicants and Mr. Ratnendu Kumar Singh and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Government Advocates for the State.
4. The facts, as borne out from the records of the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., which are relevant for deciding the present application, are as follows:
One Mr. Akash Saxena, who is alleged to be Regional Convener has made an application before the Station House Officer, Police Station-Ganj, District-Rampur under Section 154 Cr.P.C. for lodging of first information report on 3rd January, 2019 at 12:22 hrs. against Mohd. Azam Khan, Smt. Danjin Fatima/Tanjim Fatma, which has been registered on the same day i.e. 3rd January, 2019 at 13:10 hrs. as Case Crime No. 0004 of 2019, under Sections 471, 468, 467, 420 and 193 I.P.C., Police Station-Ganj, District-Rampur. In the said first information report, it has been alleged that Mohd. Azam Khan son of late Mumtaz Khan and Smt. Tanzim Fatima, wife of Mohd. Azam Khan by creating a code and plotting a well-planned conspiracy, for personal interest, had got issued two date of birth certificates of their son, namely, Abdullah Azam Khan, son of Mohd. Azam Khan, resident of Gher Meer Baaj Kha, Jail Road, Rampur of two different districts. The date of birth certificate dated 28th June, 2012 had been got issued from Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur bearing Registration No. RNPB2012-03857, which has been registered on the basis of affidavit given by Mohd. Azam Khan and Smt. Tanzim Fatima. In the said date of birth certificate, the place of birth has been shown as “Rampur”. The second date of birth certificate dated 21st January, 2015 bearing Registration No. NNLK0-B-2015-29261, had been got issued from Nagar Nigam, Lucknow, which has been registered on the basis of duplicate date of birth certificate, serial no. 718 dated 21st April, 2015 issued by Queen Mery Hospital, Lucknow. In the said date of birth certificate, the place of birth has been shown as “Lucknow”. It has further been alleged that Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan had visited foreign countries by illegally using the date of birth certificate issued by Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur. He had obtained government documents by using second date of birth certificate issued by Nagar Nigam, Lucknow. He had also used the same at various places. The aforesaid two date of birth certificates of Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan had been got issued by Mohd. Azam Khan and Smt. Tanzim Fatima by creating a code and plotting a well-planned conspiracy, for personal benefit and the same had been used, for which the present first information report has been lodged.
5. The issue of two different date of birth certificates of Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan was also up for consideration by means of Election Petition No. 08 of 2017 (Nawab Kazim Ali khan Vs. Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan). The said election petition has been allowed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 16th December, 2019 and election of Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan has been declared void. The said judgment and order of the Coordinate Bench has been challenged by Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan before the Apex Court by means of Civil Appeal No(s). 104 of 2020, wherein the Apex Court vide order dated 17th January, 2020 has calle
Board of Secondary Education of Assam vs. Md. Sarifuzzaman & Others
Devender Kumar Singla Vs. Baldev Krishan Singh
Eastern Coal Fields Limited and others vs Bajrangi Rabidas
G.V. Rao Vs. L.H.V. Prasad and others
Hira Lal Hari lal Bhagwati Vs. CBI, New Delhi
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma and others Vs. State of Bihar and another
Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd.
Jaswantrai Manilal Akhaney Vs. State of Bombay
Kartar Singh Versus State of Punjab
M.N. Ojha Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastava
Mahadeo Prasad Vs. State of West Bengal
Manoj Kumar vs Government of NCT of Delhi and others
Pepsi Foods Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors.
R.P. Kapur Versus State of Punjab
Raghubir Saran (Dr.) v. State of Bihar
Rajesh Bajaj Vs. State NCT of Delhi
Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and others
Rashmi Kumar v. Mahesh Kumar Bhada
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
S.P. ChengalVaraya Naidu (dead) by L.Rs Vs. Jagannath (dead) by L.Rs and others
S.W. Palanitkar and others Vs. State of Bihar and another
Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Shah Nawaz vs State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Sheo Nandan Paswan Vesus State of Bihar & Others
State of Bihar v. P. P. Sharma
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa and Another
State of Kerala v. O. C. Kuttan
State of Maharastra Vs. Mayer Hans George
Subramanian Swamy Versus Manmohan Singh & Another
Vir Prakash Sharma Vs. Anil Kumar Agarwal and another
Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. & Ors. Versus Mohammad Shariful Haque & Anr.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.