IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUDHIR AGARWAL, VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
M/s Amrit Bazar Patrika Pvt. Ltd. Allahabad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
WRIT -C No. 39769, 40129 of 2018
Decided on : 31-10-2019
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Sections 10, 12, 106 – GG Act, 1895 – Sections 3, 2 – Land dispute – Validity of resumption of land for 'public purpose' is concerned, it could not be disputed that land has been sought to be required by State in 'public purpose'. Allahabad City has been selected for development as a Smart City and respondents have pleaded that demand of lot of land has been made by various Government departments since various Offices, Workshops, Parks, Parking places etc. have to be constructed. The land in dispute has been found suitable for 'Sports Field'. Development of 'Sports Field' is a public purpose.
Facts of the case: Petitioner in WP-1 has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing notice passed by District Magistrate (respondent-2) informing petitioner and others that land in dispute has been resumed by State Government and therefore, the same be vacated within 15 days –A writ petition was filed by Lal Ji Pandey and others and the same was dismissed by this Court vide judgment therefore, PDA, NNA and respondent-3 were directed by respondent-2, vide letter dated to ensure take over possession of land in dispute and hand over to respondent-5
Finding of the court: Considering the facts and circumstances and also the fact that petitioners have already enjoyed interim order passed by this Court and continued in possession over land in dispute for the last almost more than a year, Court direct petitioners to vacate disputed land within one month from the date of delivery of judgment –Court may also observe that litigation initiated by petitioners on the one hand has given enough time to continue to hold and enjoy land in dispute and simultaneously denied opportunity to respondent authorities to take possession of land in question for the purpose of carrying out developmental activities where time is a matter of essence –In view of above discussion, Court do not find any merit in both the petitions –Subject to above direction about vacation of land in dispute
Result: Writ Petitions dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Sudhir Agarwal, J.
1. Both these writ petitions relate to Nazul Land i.e. Plot No.120-1/2 Civil Station, Allahabad. Total area of aforesaid plot is 12219.60 Sq.Meters and in both the matters, petitioners are claiming their rights over half of said plot. Since they relate to same plot, therefore, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
2. Writ Petition No. 39769 of 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “WP-1”) has been filed by M/s Amrit Bazar Patrika Pvt. Ltd. Allahabad having its registered office at 9, India Exchange Place, 7th Floor, Room No.1A, Kolkata through its authorized Secretary, Ranen Chaterjee (General Manager). State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Planning Development; District Magistrate, Allahabad and Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue (Nazul) are impleaded as respondents 1, 2 and 3; Allahabad Development Authority (Now Prayagraj Development Authority) (hereinafter referred to as “PDA”) is respondent no.4 and Nagar Nigam Allahabad (Now Nagar Nigam, Prayagraj), through Nagar Ayukt (hereinafter referred to as “NNP”) is impleaded as respondent-5.
3. Petitioner in WP-1 has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing notice dated 18.08.2018 (Annexure 1 to writ petition) passed by District Magistrate, Allahabad (respondent-2) informing petitioner and others that land in dispute has been resumed by State Government and therefore, the same be vacated within 15 days. Petitioners have also prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing letter/order dated 13.11.2018 issued in respect of land in dispute. A writ petition No.36210 of 2018 was filed by Lal Ji Pandey and others and the same was dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 31.10.2018, therefore, PDA, NNA and respondent-3 were directed by respondent-2, vide letter dated 13.11.2018, to ensure take over possession of land in dispute and hand over to respondent-5.
4. Facts in brief in respect of WP-1 are that a registered lease deed dated 01.3.1862 was executed by Commissioner of Allahabad Division in favour of “William Rowe” on yearly rent of Rs.30/-for the purpose of building a dwelling house. Term of lease was 50 years with the condition that lessee, if desirous of taking a new lease, should at lease six calendar months before expiration, signify his intention or desire of a new lease by a notice in writing to Secretary to the Government of North Western Provinces, or to such person as shall be appointed in that behalf by Government. The disputed land bear plot no.120 -1/2, had an area of 3 acres 45 sq.yards. A new lease deed subsequently was executed on 12.5.1915 in respect of disputed land i.e. Plot No.120-1/2, area 3 acres 45 Sq. Yards by Collector, Allahabad District on behalf of Secretary of State in favour of Anandi Prasad Dube, son of Bal Mukund, resident of 10, Edmonstone Road, Allahabad, for a period of 50 years, commencing from 15.3.1912, on yearly rent of Rs.40/-. Broadly, stipulations/terms of lease, relevant for our purpose are as under :
(ii) AND ALSO will from time to time and at all times during the said term pay and discharge all rates, taxes, charges and assessment of every description which are now or may at any time hereafter during said term be assessed charged or imposed upon the said premise hereby demised or the building erected thereupon or the landlord or tenant in respect thereof
(iii) AND ALSO will not without the previous consent in writing of the said Collector erect or setup or suffer to be erected or setup on any part of the said premises hereby demised any messuage or building other than and except the messuage and building already erected and delincated upon the map here to annexed.
(iv) AND THAT if breach of the said proceeding covenant any messuage or building is erected or se
Azim Ahmad Kazmi and others vs. State of U.P. and Another (2012) 7 SCC 278
Amarsarjit Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1962 SC 1305
Bansraj Lalta Prasad Mishra v. Stanley Parker Jones
Babu Ram alias Durga Prasad v. Indra Pal Singh
Bishan Das and others Vs. State of Punjab and others AIR 1961 SC 1570
Cauvery Coffee Traders, Mangalore v. Hornor Resources (International Company Limited)
CIT v. V. MR.P. Firm Muar AIR 1965 SC 1216
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Anant Raj Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (2016) 11 SCC 406
Dalmia Dadri Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1958] 34 ITR 514 (SC) : AIR 1958 SC 816
Director of Endowments, Govt. of Hyderabad vs. Akram Ali
Express Newspaper Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. Union of India and others
Hajee S.V.M. Mohamed Jamaludeen Bros. & Co. vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (1997) 3 SCC 466
Lallu Yeshwant Singh (dead) by his legal representative vs. Rao Jagdish Singh and others
Lala Kishun Chand vs. Sheo Dutta
Mohammed Hanif Vs. State of Assam (1969) 2 SCC 782
Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service
Mumbai International Airport Private Limited v. Golden Chariot Airport and another
NTPC Ltd. v. Reshmi constructions, Builders & Contractors
Nayak Vajesingji Joravarsingji v. Secretary of State for India in Council AIR 1924 PC 216
Promod Chandra Deb v. State of Orissa AIR 1962 SC 1288
Pierce Leslie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Miss Violet Ouchterlony Wapsnare
Purshottam Dass Tandon and others vs, State of U.P. And others
P.R. Deshpande v. Maruti Balaram Haibatti
Pradeep Oil Corporation vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others (2011) 5 SCC 270
Ramesh Chandra Sankla v. Vikram Cement (2008)14 SCC 58
Raja Rajinder Chand v. Mst. Sukhi
R.V. Bhupal Prasad vs. State of A.P. (1995) 5 SCC 698
Sevoke Properties Ltd. vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. AIR 2019 SC 2664
State of Punjab and others v. Dhanjit Singh Sandhu (2014) 15 SCC 144
State of U.P. and others vs. United Bank of India and others (2016) 2 SCC 757
Shakira Khatoon Kazmi vs. State of U.P.
State of Rajasthan vs. Sajjanlal Panjawat AIR 1975 SC 706
State of U.P. vs. Zahoor Ahmad
Shanti Prasad Devi and others vs. Shankar Mahto and others (2005) 5 SCC 543
State of Orissa Vs. Ram Chandra Dev AIR 1964 SC 685
Sarwarlal vs. State of Hyderabad
Thakur Amar Singhji v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1955 SC 504
V. Chandrasekaran and another v. Administrative Officer and others
Wazir Chand Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 415
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.