JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Madan Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A for the State. Despite of service of notice upon opposite party no. 2, no one has appeared on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

2. The Present Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 102 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "JJ Act, 2015") against the judgment dated 9.3.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Moradabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 2021 (arising out of Case No. 21 of 2020), whereby the learned appellate court has rejected the appeal and affirmed the order dated 22.1.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Moradabad. The Juvenile Justice Board has also rejected the bail application of juvenile 'X' which has been filed by his natural guardian/father, under Section 12 of "JJ Act, 2015", in case Crime No. 162 of 2020 under Sections 302, 34 of The Indian Penal Code (in short "IPC") Police Station Bhojpur, District Moradabad by the order dated 22.1.2021.

3. Being aggrieved of the judgment and order dated 9.3.2021 and 22.1.2021 passed by the Appellate Court as well as