JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Apoorva Tewari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Mohan Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, learned Counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner by means of present petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India has sought the following main reliefs:-

"a) To issue an appropriate order or direction commanding the respondent no. 1 to decide the revision of the petitioner preferred under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 read with Section 12 of the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 expeditiously within a fixed reasonable period of time:

b) To issue an appropriate order or direction commanding the respondent no. 2 not to take any coercive measures against the petitioner pursuant to recovery certificate dated 12.09.2019 during the pendency of revision before the respondent no. 1:"

3. At the very outset, on pointing out regarding the defect as pointed out by the Registry of this Court, which is to the effect that the present petition for relief(s) sought is cognizable by the Division Bench of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of Indi