SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 336

Sudhir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Seemant Singh
For the Respondent: Purnendu Kumar Singh, Satish Kumar Rai, Siddharth Singhal

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Budhwar, J.

Contents

Exordium ………………………………………………………..….3

Relevant Statutory Enactments/Order ………………………....12

Argument of Petitioner (Suitors)………………………………….17

Arguments of Respondents/Answerers ………………………....22

Replication of the Petitioners/Suitors …………………….…...…24

Questions of Determination ………………...………………..……24

Discussions ………………………………………..……………..…24

Summation ……………………………………………..……..……59

Conclusion …………………………………………..………..…….60

Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition No.4817 of 2020, (Sudhir and two others Vs. State of U.P. & 6 others) (Group-I) as well as Sri Navin Kumar Sharma in Writ Petition No.4856 of 2020, (Virendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others) (Group-II) and Sri Indra Raj Singh in Writ Petition No.14831 of 2020, (Sunil Kumar Singh Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board) (Group-III), as well as Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Sri Shashi Prakash Singh, Addl. Solicitor General assisted by Sri Purnendu Kumar Singh, learned cou








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top