SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Pradeep Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Through Secretary (Higher Education) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the petitioner -Sri Pradeep Kumar Gupta, in person and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Also, on the request of the Court, Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, Advocate has assisted the Court to ascertain the correct facts.
2. The petitioner is a differently abled person having 50% locomotor disorder. On 24.06.2006, an advertisement was published inviting applications for appointment, amongst other, on the post of Library Peon (one post) at Government Degree College, Deoband, Saharanpur. The essential qualifications prescribed were Class V pass and ability to ride cycle. The petitioner applied for appointment on that post. He was called for interview. However, in the interview, the petitioner was not evaluated. It is his grievance, he was summarily required to leave as he could not ride a bicycle, which test was insisted upon him though the petitioner could ride a tricycle with equal efficiency. Thus, the petitioner claims violation of his rights and alleges humiliation caused to him, mainly by the then Principal of the Government Degree College, Deoband, Saharanpur.
3. The petitioner agitated the matter. Subsequently, a higher educational qualification (for the post of L
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
Francis Coralie Mullin v. UT of Delhi [Francis Coralie Mullin v. UT of Delhi
K.S. Puttaswamy (Privacy-9J) Vs. Union of India
Mehmood Nayyar Azam v. State of Chhattisgarh
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences v. Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.