State of U. P. through Chief Secretary, Government of U. P. , Lucknow vs Anurag

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 1179

RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
State of U. P. through Chief Secretary, Government of U. P. , Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Anurag – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Advocate General, Mr. M.C. Chaturvedi, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Suresh Singh, Additional Chief Standing Counsel in person; and Dr. L.P. Mishra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarvesh Dubey, Advocate and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh
For the Respondents:Mr. H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishabh Srivastava and Ms. Durga Tiwari, Mr. A.P. Singh, Mr. V.P. Singh, Ms. Geeta Chauhan, Ms. Pratima Rani, Ms. Richa Singh, Mr. Satyendra Kumar Singh, Mr. B.M. Singh, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Om, Advocates in person; and Mr. Mukund Madhav Asthana, Mr. Hemant Kumar Mishra, Ms. Surangama Sharma and Ms.Meenakshi Singh Parihar

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the leading case (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. statutory regime and its implications (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. financial proposals and their implementations (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's prior directives and issues (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. state government's counterarguments (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. judicial observations on executive powers (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
8. court findings on previous judgments (Para 22 , 23)
9. arguments from the state (Para 24 , 25)
10. arguments from the petitioners (Para 26 , 27)
11. counterarguments analysis (Para 28 , 29)
12. analysis of legislative context (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
13. analysis of funding issues (Para 33 , 34)
14. role of instructors in education (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
15. legislative responsibility and implications (Para 39 , 40)
16. court's conclusions on financial responsibilities (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
17. final court directives and rulings (Para 45 , 46)
18. conclusion of appeals (Para 47 , 48)

ORDER :

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of Appeals raising similar questions of law and fact. Writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(All) 1179

RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIRState of U. P. through Chief Secretary, Government of U. P. , Lucknow – AppellantVersusAnurag – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
State of U. P. through Chief Secretary, Government of U. P. , Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Anurag – Respondent