RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Virendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
1. Heard Sri Krishna Nand Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the accused persons against the judgment and order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar, District Maharajganj in Complaint Case No. 119/123 (State vs. Ram Bhawan and Others) under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. Police Station-Chowk, District Maharajganj. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Maharajganj vide impugned order has attached ½ part of the land in dispute Araji No. 550, Ara 0.737 hectare, Araji No. 573, Area 1.753 Hectare, Araji No. 606, Area 1.181 Hectare and Araji No. 454, Area 0.117 Hectare, till disposal of the question of right and title of the parties. He also directed the S.H.O. Chowk to take possession of the plots in dispute and give the entrustment of same to any impartial person who will provide the statement of income and expenditure of the plots before the Court from time to time. Any further proceeding in the case will not be undertaken after the final adjudication of the question of succession of the property of deceased-Shahdeo.
3. Feeling
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.