IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ABDUL MOIN, J.
Smt. Lali Devi - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P., Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayatiraj Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others - Respondents
Writ - C No. 900 of 2023
Decided On : 02-02-2023
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Section 12-C - Points of determination framed - Instant writ petition has been filed praying for main reliefs - Held, Moreover, point in issue before revisional Court was only a short point which already stands settled by decisions as have been cited above - Sufficient reasons emerge from order passed by learned Election Tribunal in orders as to why re-counting has been directed - Court does not find any illegality or infirmity with reasons recorded by learned Election Tribunal or revisional Court while directing for a re-counting - Accordingly, said grounds as taken by petitioner are also rejected - Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 3 and Sri U.S. Sahai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:-
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Maholi/ Prescribed Authority District Sitapur in Case No. 1678/2021 (Election Petition No. 19/23) Mahaveer Vs. Smt. Lali Devi and Ors. U/S 12 (C) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 contained as Annexure No. 2 to this petition in the interest of justice.
(iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 23.01.2022-23 by means which again the order of the re-counting has been passed by the prescribe authority contained as Annexure No. 3 to this petition in the interest of justice.
3. The case set forth by the petitioner is that an election of Gram Pradhan took place in the year 2021. The petitioner was declared elected as Gram Pradhan of Village Peerpur, Gram Panchayat Dadabad, Post Office- Hathiya Kasimpur, Nyaypanchayat Urdauli, Vikash Khand Maholi, Tehsil- Maholi District-Sitapur. The respondent no. 5 herein namely Sri Mahaveer filed an election petition under Section 12-C of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1947") before the learned Election Tribunal challenging the election of the petition. A copy of the election petition has been filed as annexure 4 to the writ petition. The learned Election Tribunal vide order dated 02.09.2022, a copy of which is annexure 2 to the petition after framing various issues directed for re-counting of the votes and disposed of the election petition.
4. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed a writ petition namely Writ-C No. 6140 of 2022 In re; Smt. Lali Devi Vs. State of U.P. and Ors. and this Court vide order dated 08.09.2022, a copy of which is annexure 6 to the writ petition disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the statutory forum by filing of a revision under the provisions of Section 12-C (6) of the Act, 1947.
5. In pursuance thereof, the petitioner filed a revision bearing Revision No. 47 of 2022 In re; Lali Devi Vs. S.D.M Maholi and Ors. before the Court of the learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge, Sitapur. The revisional Court vide order dated 22.09.2022, a copy of which is annexure 8 to the writ petition dismissed the revision.
6. The petitioner being aggrieved filed a writ petition bearing Writ-C No. 7328 of 2022 In re; Lali Devi Vs. State of U.P and Ors. and this Court vide order judgment and order dated 22.10.2022, a copy of which is annexure 9 to the writ petition set aside the order passed by the revisional Court dated 22.09.2022 and required the revisional Court to decide the matter expeditiously.
7. In pursuance thereof, the revisional Court vide order impugned dated 03.01.2023, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition has partly allowed the revision filed by petitioner and has set aside the order of the learned Election Tribunal so far as it had directed that the records of election petition be consigned to record. Further, the revisional Court has restored the election petition to its original number and has directed the learned Election Tribunal to dispose of the election petition as per law expeditiously.
Uday Chand Vs. Surat Singh and Anr.
Arikala Narasa Reddy v. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari and Anr.
Ram Sewak Yudav v. Hussain Kamil Kidwai
Dr. Jagjit Singh v. Giani Kartar Singh
Jitendra Bahadur Singh v. Krishna Behari
Shashi Bhusan v. Prof. Balraj Madhok
Sumitra Devi v. Shri Sheo Shanker Prasad Yadav
A recount can only be ordered when specific allegations of counting irregularities are proven with supporting evidence, prioritizing electoral integrity over secrecy.
Recounting of votes requires a prima facie case supported by cogent evidence; mere differences in vote counts do not justify recounting.
The necessity for a prima facie case to be established before ordering a recount of votes, and the requirement for adequate statement of material facts and contemporaneous evidence to support the all....
An order for recount does not dispose of the election application finally, and the burden of proof rests on the election petitioner to establish irregularity or illegality in the original counting of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.