SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Rukhsani – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri H.P. Sahi, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Udai Chandani, learned counsel appearing for private respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Present writ petition has been filed to challenge the order dated 12.01.2022 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Handia, District -Prayagraj in Case No. 02002 of 2021 (Smt. Soni Vs. Rukhsani & Ors.) being proceedings in the nature of election petition under Section 12-C of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). By that order, the election tribunal has directed for recount of votes cast at the election for gram panchayat -Baraut.
3. Preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Udai Chandani, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents, as to maintainability of the present writ petition. Referring to the impugned order, he would submit, the election tribunal has determined issue nos. 1 to 5 framed in the election petition and thereafter proceeded to pass an order of recount. Relying on a decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Athar Hussain Vs. Razda Begum & Ors., 2017 (1) 35 RD
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.