KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Parul Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
L. I. C. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Kshitij Shailendra, J.)
1. Heard Shri Rajendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Udai Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent-Life Insurance Corporation.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by one Smt. Parul Agarwal, wife of late Vishal Agarwal challenging the impugned order dated 10.09.2015 (annexed as ‘Annexure No.6’ to the writ petition) whereby the Insurance Ombudsman, (Western U.P. and Uttarakhand), has dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner against rejection of her claim by the Senior Divisional Managar of the Life Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Corporation’) concerning the insurance policy Nos.256487214 and 256487400 vide order dated 14.03.2014 which has also been challenged. Futher prayer is to issue a direction to the respondent no.1 to pay to the petitioner the amount payable under policy Nos.256487214 and 256487400.
Facts of the Case
3. The facts culled out from the pleadings contained in the writ petition are that Vishal Agarwal, i.e. husband of the petitioner, was holder of three insurance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.