RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Anand Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. , Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Affairs Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. Nusrat Jahan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. In view of the proposed order, the issuance of notice to opposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with.
3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings to the extent of Applicant in pursuance of summoning order dated 26.08.2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Court No. 28, Lucknow in Case No. 2852 of 2016 (State Vs. Anand Kumar Pandey) arising out of chargesheet no. 220/2015 dated 28.12.2015 under Sections 406/420/467/468 I.P.C. arising out of Case Crime No. 497 of 2014 dated 14.10.2014 under Sections 406/420/467/468 I.P.C. P.S Chowk, District Lucknow in respect of the Applicant.
4. The learned Magistrate had taken cognizance and passed the summoning order on 26.08.2016. The cognizance was taken on the printed proforma by filling the sections of IPC, dates and number and in the said proforma the learned Magistrate without assigning any reason has summoned the applicants for facing trial.
5. Learned counsel for the ap
Menka Gandhi v. Union of India
Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. State of Bihar
Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
P. Ramchandra Rao v. State of Karnatka
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi
Bhushan Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.