Wajid Ansari vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 576

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 576

GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Wajid Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shamasul Eslam.

JUDGMENT :

GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

1- orZeku nkf.Md Ádh.kZ tekur ÁkFkZuk i=] vkonsd okftn valkjh dh vksj ls eqŒvŒlaŒ 11@2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 376 HkkŒnaŒfoŒ /kkjk 67 bUQkesZ'ku VsDuksykWth ,DV] Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk ckfy;k esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq ÁLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

2- vkonsd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

3- vkonsd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ ÁLrqr fd;k fd vkonsd dks bl Ádj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ &#2338ax ls >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA

4- ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 164 nŒÁŒlaŒ ds c;ku esa dgk fd ^^o"kZ 2019 dh ?kVuk gS esjs eksckby dh ?kVuk gS esjs eksckby dh ,ylhMh [kjkc gks x;h FkhA eSaus viuk Qksu okftn valkjh ¼vkosnd½ dh nqdku ij fn;k FkkA nks fnu ckn cukdj ns fn;k FkkA ?kj tkus ij esjs QksVks o ?kjokyksa ds uEcj ij Hkstus yxk QksVkst ilZuy Fkh okftn valkjh eq>s /kedh nsus yxk fd vxj ugha vkvksxh rks rqEgkjh QksVks rqEgkjs ?kjokyksa dks Hkst nawxkA eSa Mj ls ckfy;k mlls feyus 14 Qjojh 2019 dks vk;h Fkh o eq>s ckbd ij fcBkdj isIlh gksVy ysdj x;k ogka ij esjs lkFk cykRdkj fd;k o esjh QksVkst ys fy;k ,d nks fnu 'kkar jgk fQj ls eq>s /kedh nsrk jgrk gS cqykrk FkkA mlds ckn esa ugha x;hA**

5- mDr ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 164 nŒÁŒl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document