BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Pramod Kumar Shahi @ Mantoo Shahi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Special Trial No. 582 of 2020, Case Crime No. 59 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station-Ahirauli Bazar, District-Kushinagar, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (S.C.)/(S.T.) Act, Kushinagar (State Vs. Pramod Kumar Shahi and Others) as well as summoning order dated 05.12.2020 passed by the aforesaid court in respect of the aforesaid case, with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.
3. Learned counsel for applicants submitted that the entire prosecution story is false and applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that impugned charge sheet dated 16.09.2020 and cognizance taken on 05.12.2020 by the court below on the printed proforma, is without application of mind and the same is not sustainable in the eyes of law. He further submitted that the same controversy has been settled by this
Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar, (1980)1 SCC 81
Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak
P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnatka
H.N. Rishbud vs. State of Delhi
UP Pollution Control Board Vs. Mohan Meakins
Kanti Bhadra Vs. State of West Bengal
Bhushan Kumar and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.