SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 484

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
Vivek Chaudhary, Subhash Vidyarthi, JJ.
Anshuman Singh Rathore - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Edu. New Delhi and Others – Respondents
WRIT - C No. - 6049 of 2023, WRIT - A No. - 29324 of 2019, WRIT - A No. - 3735 of 2012, WRIT - A No. - 5548 of 2014, WRIT - A No. – 3615, 481 of 2020
Decided On : 22-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: In Person, Aditya Kumar Tiwari, Ghulam Mohammad Kamil, Pt. S. Chandra, Akber Ahmad (Amicus Curiae), Gaurav Mehrotra (Amicus Curiae), Madhukar Ojha (Amicus Curiae), Mohammad Imran, R.N. Gupta, Anurag Tripathi, Ashok K.Mishra, Aftab Ahmad, Nitin Kumar Mishra, Azhar Faiz Khan, Vinod Kumar Pandey, Madan Mohan Srivastava
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I., Afzal Ahmad Siddiqui, Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Anand Dwivedi, Iqbal Ahmad, Mohd. Kumail Haider, Sanjeev Singh, Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Sudhanshu Chauhan, Syed Husain, Vikas Singh, Afzal Siddiqui, Gauri Shankar Maurya, Mahendra Bahadur Singh, Prem Shanker Trivedi, Ghulam Mohammad Kamil

The Madarsa Act, 2004 violates the secular principles of the Constitution and the right to quality education, rendering it unconstitutional.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 21-A, 25, 26, 28, 30 - U.P. Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 - The Act was challenged for violating secularism and fundamental rights to education - The Court found that the Act promotes religious education, violating the secular nature mandated by the Constitution - The syllabus emphasizes religious instruction over modern subjects, failing to provide quality education - The Act was declared unconstitutional for conflicting with the principles of secularism and the UGC Act. (Paras 99, 100)

(B) Secularism - Definition and implications - The Court reiterated that secularism is a basic feature of the Constitution, requiring equal treatment of all religions by the State and prohibiting the mixing of religion with secular activities. (Paras 62, 63)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the Madarsa Act, arguing it violates the secular nature of education mandated by the Constitution, as it promotes religious education and fails to provide quality education to children in Madarsas. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
The Madarsa Act was found to be unconstitutional as it violates the principles of secularism and the right to quality education under Articles 21 and 21-A. The Court directed the State to accommodate Madarsa students in regular schools. (Paras 99, 100)

Issues: The main issues included whether the Madarsa Act violates the principle of secularism and the right to education as guaranteed by the Constitution. (Paras 7, 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Madarsa Act's provisions for religious education violate the secular nature of the Indian Constitution, which mandates equal treatment of all religions and prohibits the State from favoring any particular religion in educational institutions. (Paras 62-64)

Result: The Madarsa Act, 2004 is declared unconstitutional. (Para 99)

JUDGMENT :

(A)

Reference Order And Introductory Facts

(B)

Submissions Of Parties

(C)

Preliminary Objection

(D)

History Of Madarsas In State Of U.P. And Relevant Provisions Of Madarsa Act And Regulations

(E)

Grounds Of Challenge:

 

(I) Violative Of Secularism Article 14

 

(II) Violative Of Articles 21 And 21-A

 

(III) Conflict Of Madarsa Act And U.G.C. Act

(F)

Conclusion

(A) REFERENCE ORDER AND INTRODUCTORY FACTS

1. A Single Judge Bench hearing Writ A No. 29324 of 2019 (Mohammed Javed versus State of U.P. and others), passed the following order on 23.10.2019: -

    “1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner.

    2. Sri Alok Sharma, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has accepted notices on behalf of opposite party no.1 and 3, Sri Afzal Siddiqui, learned counsel has accepted notices on behalf of opposite party no.2.

    3. Issue notice to opposite party no.4 returnable at an early date.

    4. Petitioner has filed present writ petition claiming that he was appointed as part-time assistant teacher in the year 2011 for the primary Section of respondent no.4 Madrasa Nisarul Uloom Shahzadpur, Akbarpur Post Office, District Ambedkar Nagar on a fix salary of Rs.4,000/- per month, subject to 8% annual increment. He prays that no regular appointment should be made by respondent no.1 to 3 i.e. the State Government, the Madarsa Shiksha Parishad and District Minority Welfare Officer and his service should be regularized. Further prayer is that he should be paid salary as is being paid to the regular teachers.

    5. Petitioner places reliance upon the provisions of U.P. Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 (Madarsa Act, 2004) and the regulations framed thereunder. At the time of hearing, perusal of the Madarsa Act, 2004, Section 2(h) defines:-

    “Section 2(h):-Madarsa-Education” means education in Arbic Urdu, Parsian, Islamic- studies, Tibb Logic, Philosophy and includes such other branches of learning as may be specified by the Board from time to time.”

    6. For the purposes of Madarsa education, a Board is constituted under Section 3 of the Madarsa Act, 2004 which reads :-

    “Section 3(3) The Board shall consist of the following members, namely:

    (a) a renowned Muslim educationist in the field of traditional Madarsa-Education, nominated by the State Government who shall be the Chairperson of the Board;

    (b) the Director, who shall be the Vice-Chairperson of the Board;

    (c) the Principal, Government Oriental College, Rampur;

    (d) one Sunni-Muslim Legislator to be elected by both houses of the State Legislature;

    (e) one Shia-Muslim Legislator to be elected by both houses of the State Legislature;

    (f) one representative of National Council for Educational Research and Training;

    (g) two head of institution established and administered by Sunni-Muslim nominated by the State Government;

    (h) one head of institution established and administered by Shia-Muslim nominated by the State Government;

    (i) two teachers of institutions established and administered by Sunni-Muslim nominated by the State Government;

    (j) one teacher of an institution established and administered by Shia-Muslim nominated by the State Government;

    (k) one Science or Tibb teacher of an institution nominated by the State Government;

    (l) the Account and Finance Officer in the Directorate of minority Welfare, Uttar Pradesh;

    (m) the Inspector;

    (n) an officer not below the rank of Deputy Director nominated by the State Government, who shall be the member Registrar;

    7. From perusal of the same, following questions arise for consideration:-

    (i) Since the Madarsa Board is constituted for education in ‘Arbic, Urdu, Parsian, Islamic-studies, Tibb Logic, Philosophy and includes such other branches of learning as may be specified by the Board from time to time’, how come persons of a particular religion are provided to be member of the same? It does not talks about exponence in the aforesaid fields, for the purposes of which the Board

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top