Back
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Anshuman Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Edu. New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
| (A) | Reference Order And Introductory Facts |
| (B) | Submissions Of Parties |
| (C) | Preliminary Objection |
| (D) | History Of Madarsas In State Of U.P. And Relevant Provisions Of Madarsa Act And Regulations |
| (E) | Grounds Of Challenge: |
|
| (I) Violative Of Secularism Article 14 |
|
| (II) Violative Of Articles 21 And 21-A |
|
| (III) Conflict Of Madarsa Act And U.G.C. Act |
| (F) | Conclusion |
(A) REFERENCE ORDER AND INTRODUCTORY FACTS
1. A Single Judge Bench hearing Writ A No. 29324 of 2019 (Mohammed Javed versus State of U.P. and others), passed the following order on 23.10.2019: -
2. Sri Alok Sharma, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has accepted notices on behalf of opposite party no.1 and 3, Sri Afzal Siddiqui, learned counsel has accepted notices on behalf of opposite party no.2.
3. Issue notice to opposite party no.4 returnable at an early date.
4. Petitioner has filed present writ petition claiming that he was appointed as part-time assistant teacher in the year 2011 for the primary Section of respondent no.4 Madrasa Nisarul Uloom Shahzadpur, Akbar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
