SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Vijaishri Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's role and appointment context (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. process for selection of registrar at iiit allahabad (Para 3 , 4 , 9 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. selection committee procedures and candidates' rights (Para 5 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 20 , 26) |
| 4. irregularities in committee composition can lead to voiding selections. (Para 6) |
| 5. deviations from statutory procedures in selection process (Para 18 , 22) |
| 6. choosing members without proper approval affects selection validity. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. judicial dismissal of writ petitions (Para 56) |
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Petitioner before this Court is holding the post of Professor in Respondent-Institute, i.e., Indian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as “IIIT, Allahabad”) and was handed over charge to the post of Registrar (Acting) of Institute on 01.12.2022 due to unfortunate demise of earlier Acting Registrar, Professor Shirshu Verma.
2. In order to appoint a permanent Registrar, the Institute has issued Advertisement dated 27.07.2021 advertising one post of Registrar and one post of Deputy Registrar. “General Instructions” for candidates, being relevant as mentioned in the advertisemen
Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Hindustan Construction Company Limited and Others
Kuntesh Gupta Vs. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya Sitapur and Others
Prabhu Narain Singh Vs. Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi
The court determined that deviations from prescribed selection processes and involvement of candidates in influencing decisions voided the selection process, emphasizing the need for procedural fairn....
The court upheld the validity of the university's selection process, emphasizing statutory compliance, lack of demonstrated irregularities, and proper formation of the selection committee despite a v....
Candidates participating in a recruitment process do not have a legal right to appointment if the selection process is found to be flawed and thus invalid.
A candidate cannot challenge a selection process after participating and being unsuccessful; such claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel.
The appointment of an In-charge Director must follow established procedures and guidelines, and any deviation from these norms, especially influenced by bias or favoritism, renders the appointment in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.