Back
SUNITA AGARWAL, VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Committee of Management, D. P. Public High School Mirzapur – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of land acquisition case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. criteria and limits of judicial review (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. conditions under which review is permissible (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. arguments for and against review (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. decision to deny review (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76758 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 11157 of 2013 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76755 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 11159 of 2013 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76750 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 20719 of 2013 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76733 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 7490 of 2012 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76728 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 56451 of 2011 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76739 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 55314 of 2011 |
| In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76745 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 54341 of 2010 |
1. Heard Sri Manish Goyal learned Senior
Review jurisdiction is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record; it cannot involve re-evaluation of evidence or serve as an appeal.
The court clarified that subsequent changes in law do not permit review of earlier judgments under established principles of review jurisdiction, emphasizing the notion of finality in judicial decisi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
