SUNITA AGARWAL, VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
D. P. Public High School Mirzapur – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review! Application No. 76758 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 11157 of 2013
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76755 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 11159 of 2013
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76750 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 20719 of 2013
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76733 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 7490 of 2012
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76728 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 56451 of 2011
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76739 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 55314 of 2011
In Re: Civil Misc. (Review) Application No. 76745 of 2017 filed in Writ-C No. 54341 of 2010
Heard Sri Manish Goyal learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Praveen Kumar, Sri Kamaljeet Singh and Sri Suresh Singh learned counsels appearing for the respondent authority M Sri P.K. Chaurasia and Ms. Sarita Shukla learned counsels for the opposite parties/writ petitioners on the review applications related to the acquisition of the land of Village Mirzapur.
2. This bunch of review petitions is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2016 passed by this Court in allowing seven writ petitions challenging ac
Abhiram Taleshwar Sharma v. Abhiram Pishak Sharma (1979 (4) SCC 389
Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Netaji Cricket Club
Chajju Ram v. Neki Ram AIR 1922 PC 112
Col. Avtar Singh Sekhon v. Union of India
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque
Jain Studios Ltd. v. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd.
Kerala State Electricity Board v. Hitech Electrothermics ' Hydropower Ltd. (2005) 6 SCC 651
Krishna Nand Shukla v. Director of Higher Education, Allahabad
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Murali Sundaram v. Jothibai Kannan
Nand Kishore Gupta v. State of U.P.
Pancham Lal Pandey v. Neeraj Kumar Mishra
Patel Narshi Thakershi v. Pradyumansinghji Arjunsinghji
Perry Kansagra v. Smriti Madan Kansagra
Radhey Shyam (Dead) Through Lrs. v. State of U.P.
Rajendra Singh v. Lt. Governor, Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Sahara India Commercial Corporation Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2017) 11 SCC 339
Shanti Conductors Private Limited v. Assam State Electricity Board
Smt. Meera Bhanjia v. Smt. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury 1995 (1) SCC 170
Sow Chandra Kante v. Sheikh Habib
Review jurisdiction is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record; it cannot involve re-evaluation of evidence or serve as an appeal.
The court clarified that subsequent changes in law do not permit review of earlier judgments under established principles of review jurisdiction, emphasizing the notion of finality in judicial decisi....
The court established that land acquired for public purpose cannot be restored to the original owners once possession is taken, regardless of subsequent non-utilization.
The court upheld the legality of invoking urgency provisions in land acquisition for integrated development, emphasizing adherence to judicial precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.