SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1259

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Manoj Kumar Gupta, Kshitij Shailendra, JJ.
Mohd Rashid Qureshi and Others – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 4633 of 2024
Decided On : 06-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Abhijat Awasthi, Abu Bakht.
For the Respondent: Vaibhav Tripathi.

IMPORTANT POINT
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless the petitioner has fulfilled their own obligations, particularly when external factors hinder judicial proceedings.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Writ of Mandamus - National Highways Act, 1956, Section 3-G(5) - The court emphasized that a writ of mandamus can only be issued when there is a statutory obligation that has not been fulfilled, and the petitioner must demonstrate their own compliance with duties before seeking such a writ.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Additional Commissioner to decide a pending case under the National Highways Act, citing delays attributed to the court's operational challenges and lawyers' strikes.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the delays were largely due to lawyers' abstention from judicial work and that the petitioners had not fulfilled their own obligations, thus justifying the dismissal of the writ petition.

Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Additional Commissioner to decide a case in light of significant delays caused by external factors, including lawyers' strikes.

Ratio Decidendi: A writ of mandamus requires the petitioner to demonstrate that they have fulfilled their own duties before compelling the authority to act, especially when external factors impede judicial processes.

Result: The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to persuade their lawyers to appear before the authority concerned.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Abu Bakht, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rajiv Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, for the State-respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5.

2. The instant petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent No. 3 (Additional Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad) to decide Case No. 1450 of 2023 (Mohd. Rashid Qureshi v. State of U.P. and others) pending before him within a time bound period.

3. On 20.2.2024, after perusing the order sheet of the aforesaid case, this Court expressed surprise that on 11.10.2023, the Additional Commissioner had fixed 6.5.2024 as the next date, i.e. after an interval of more than six months. Accordingly, the Court directed respondent No. 3 to file his personal affidavit and disclose as to how many cases under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 are pending before him and the time frame within which he proposes to decide such cases.

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, Sri Brijesh Kumar, Additional Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad has filed his personal affidavit stating therein that there are three posts of Additional Commissioner in Moradabad Division, however, only two posts of Additional Commissioner (First) and Additional Commissioner (Second) were working upto January, 2024 for judicial work. It is further stated that only one Court room is available for doing judicial work by both the Additional Commissioners and, therefore, they sit in Court for three days in a week by rotation, and that respondent No. 3, Additional Commissioner (First) sits for judicial work on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, according to the allotment of work done by the Commissioner vide his order dated 22.7.2023. Further stand is that after retirement of Additional Commissioner (Second) on 31.1.2024, it is the respondent No. 3 who is doing all the judicial work as per the office order dated 19.2.2024 issued by the Commissioner. The affidavit further goes to state that apart from judicial work, he has been entrusted with several administrative works as per office orders issued by the Commissioner; there is total pendency of 1712 arbitration cases and 1149 revenue cases (i.e. total 2861 cases) in the Court of Additional Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad; and that the Commissioner and Secretary, Board of Revenue has entrusted judicial and administrative works with a direction to fix around 50 cases on a particular working day. It is further stated that on 11.10.2023, i.e. the date noted by this Court in its previous order, 129 cases were fixed for hearing, out of which, 65 cases were under Section 3-G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956 and since the advocates were abstaining from judicial work on that date, the Court Assistant fixed the next date. It is also stated that the officer will try his best to decide all pending cases at the earliest subject to the above noted impediments.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in any case, since the aforesaid matter is pending since 2023, a direction to decide the same within stipulated time frame be issued by this Court, however, learned Standing Counsel has drawn attention of this Court towards a very glaring aspect of the matter by referring to Annexure PA-5 to the personal affidavit filed by the Additional Commissioner. The said Annexure contains a tabulated depiction of the situation that with effect from 1.1.2024 till 29.2.2024, i.e. in the entire months of January and February, 2024, lawyers had throughout abstained from judicial work and the Court had functioned only for two days. The table is appended by various letters issued by the office bearers of the Bar Association and Library, Moradabad informing the District Judge, Moradabad as well as Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad that lawyers would abstain from judicial work. The reasons assigned behind such abstainment are appalling, that is to say that on various dates in the months of January and February,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top