SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1419

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Digvijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Indu Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ajay Kumar Giri, Surendra Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.)

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

    "(i) directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hawali to decide the Civil Suit No.1756 of 2023 (Digvijay Singh Versus Indu Singh and others), pending before Civil Judge, Varanasi within stipulated period."

2. From the perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioner has prayed for early disposal of Civil Suit No.1756 of 2023, pending before the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali.

3. The Division Bench of this Court in case of Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali Isteba, 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB) has held that no direction can be issued to the sub-ordinate courts for deciding the suit within stipulated period. Relevant portion of the judgment is extracted hereasunder:-

    "We are not inclined to issue a direction for the expeditious hearing of a Civil Suit which is pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District-Azamgarh. It would be most inappropriate to Court to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 and/or under Article 227 of the Constitution simply for the purpose of expediting the hearing of a suit. Such orders, if granted, place a class of litigants, who move the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top