SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5540

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.JOTHIRAMAN
Rani – Appellant
Versus
C.Chennammal (Died) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Thiyagarajan

Table of Content
1. expedited disposal of cases. (Para 2)
2. judicial discretion on case prioritization. (Para 3 , 4)
3. request for reasonable timeframes. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

Seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of the case in I.A.No.324 of 2018 in O.S.No.40 of 2013 pending on the file of the Learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri, the petitioner has preferred the present civil revision petition.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners would submit that the plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.40 of 2013 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri, seeking a judgment and decree for partition and separate possession. A preliminary decree was passed on 10.11.2014. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed an application in I.A.No.324 of 2018, seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit properties. The said application was allowed on 02.03.2019, and an Advocate Commissioner was appointed, directing him to divide the suit properties into 2/7 shares and to file a report along with a plan. However, the matter has been pending for more than seven years, and till date, the Commissioner has not filed any report. The prolo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top