SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1692

ALOK MATHUR
Amit Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Syed Anzar Husain, Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, Ram Kishan Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

ALOK MATHUR, J.

1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents.

2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the charge-sheet dated 19.10.2023 issued by Presiding Officer/Circle Officer, Sadar, District-Gonda and also seeks certiorari to quash the impugned departmental disciplinary proceedings inasmuch as against the petitioner under Rule 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officer of Subordinate Ranks, (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991.

3. It has been submitted that the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is working on the post of Head Constable in Gonda at the relevant time where a First Information Report was lodged on 04.04.2023 by one Prince Yadav, the brother-in-law of the petitioner under Section 307 I.P.C. the said FIR was lodged against Surendra Yadav, the brother-in-law of the petitioner who is alleged to have assaulted and injured the petitioner due to a family dispute. Investigation into the said occurrence was conducted and it was found that the petitioner's brother-in-law has lodged false First Information Report against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top