SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2530

ALOK MATHUR
Ghanshyam Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shrawan Kumar Verma,Amit Kumar,Smriti.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Alok Mathur, J.

Heard Sri S.K. Verma, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of punishment dated 20.06.2018 whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner appointed on the post of Technical Assistant (Class III) on 20.12.2007 by the District Programme Coordinator/Chief Development Officer, Sitapur on contract basis for a period of one year. The appointment of the petitioner was renewed from time to time.

4. It has been further stated that in the year 2018, certain complaints were made against the petitioner and a preliminary inquiry was also conducted and the report was submitted by a Committee of three persons including Block Development Officer, Assistant Engineer DRDO and Dy. Labour commissioner (Labour and Employment ), Sitapur where 04 of the 07 allegations levelled in the complaint were found to be prime facie correct and hence a charge-sheet was given to the petitioner on 18.04.2018 containing 08 charges. The petitioner duly replied to the said charges on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top