SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1998

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, DONADI RAMESH
Krishna Machine Tools – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pranjal Shukla.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Shri. Parth Goswami, holding brief of learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri. Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

2. Challenge has been raised to the ex-parte order dated 30.09.2023 issued by Commercial Tax Officer, Sector-4, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh.

3. At the outset, it has been stated, the issue involved is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Tax No. 144 of 2024 (M/s Atlas Cycles Haryana Ltd. v. State of U.P. & Anr.), Neutral Citation No. 2024:AHC:23775-DB), vide order dated 12.2.2024.

4. Undeniably, the first notice issued to the petitioner under Section 73 of Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) dated 30.09.2023 did intend to call for a reply from the petitioner but did not propose to grant personal hearing as the abbreviation "NA" was specified against the column "date of personal hearing". In that against the columns to specify the date of personal hearing, time of personal hearing and venue for personal hearing, the abbreviation "NA" i.e. Not Applicable were recorded.

5. In view of the above position admitted on the record, the only conclusion possible to be drawn is that the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top