Back
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, VINOD DIWAKAR
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Parmeshwari Dayal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. intra-court appeal filed against a single judge's order. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. selection process for fisherman posts with significant complaints. (Para 8 , 9 , 13) |
| 3. importance of transparency and fairness in public selections. (Para 14 , 32 , 54) |
| 4. judicial review limits and principles of legality. (Para 61 , 62 , 66) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition without reversing prior salary. (Para 68 , 69) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Shri Arimardan Singh Rajpoot, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel along with Shri Piyush Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents-appellants and Shri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the petitioners-respondents.
2. The present intra-court appeal has been filed by the respondents-appellants/State, arising from the order of the learned single judge dated 01.12.2017, passed in Writ-A No. 16890 of 2016 (Parmeshwari Dayal and 14 others v. State of U.P. and 8 others). By that order, the learned single judge has allowed that writ petition filed by 15 petitioners-respondents and quashed the order dated 17.03.2016, passed by the Principal Secretary, Matsya Utpadan Anubhag; order dated 18.3.2016 passed by the Director of Fisheries and, order dated 30
Public employment recruitment must adhere to fairness and transparency principles; systemic irregularities justify cancellation of selection processes. No vested rights exist without appointment lett....
Cancellation of completed selection process and panel for minor, curable irregularities is arbitrary and disproportionate; unsuccessful candidates estopped from post-result challenges; promotion righ....
The selection process must be fair and transparent; systemic irregularities can invalidate the entire process, even if some candidates are innocent of wrongdoing.
(1) Appointment – Normally, it is not for courts to interfere unless process smacks of mala fides – However, right to be considered for public employment being a Fundamental Right, it would be safe a....
Mere selection in recruitment does not confer indefeasible right to appointment if process tainted by procedural irregularities confirmed by inquiry; authority may bona fide withhold without hearing ....
In cases of widespread irregularities in selection processes, cancellation of entire selection is justified, as separation of affected candidates is not feasible.
The court emphasized that the integrity of public employment selections must be maintained, ruling that the failure to publish the master answer key and deletion of original data rendered the selecti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
