Back
SAURABH LAVANIA
Mahanth Murali Das – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Lavania, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for all the respondents.
2. By means of impugned order dated 02.06.2023, respondent no. 4/the Joint Magistrate/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District-Ayodhya in exercise of power under Sections 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (in short "Act, 1901"), decided the Case No. 3174/2023 (Computerized Case No. T202304230103174, State v. Mahanth Murali Das), whereby the entry in revenue records favourable to the petitioner has been expunged and the authority has been directed to record the land in the name of State.
3. Vide impugned order dated 01.12.2023, the Revisional Authority in the Act, 1901 namely respondent no. 3/ Member Judicial, Board of Revenue at Lucknow dismissed the Revision No. Rev/1842/2023/Ayodhya (Computerized Case No. R20230423001842) Mahanth Murali Das v. State through Collector District Ayodhya which was instituted under Section 219 of Act, 1901 by the petitioner.
4. Assailing the order dated 01.12.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner says that the order is completely non-speaking order as several grounds were taken in the memo of revision, however, the Revisio
A quasi-judicial authority must provide a reasoned order to ensure transparency and accountability in decision-making.
A mere recital of vague reasons would not be sufficient nor a matter like the present one where the aggrieved party has a right to know the reasons for the decision being taken either for or against ....
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide reasoned and speaking orders to ensure transparency and prevent arbitrary decision-making.
It is a settled legal proposition that not only administrative but also judicial order must be supported by reasons, recorded in it. Thus, while deciding an issue, the Court is bound to give reasons ....
Quasi-judicial authorities must record detailed reasons for decisions, ensuring procedural fairness and preventing arbitrary action.
Point of Law : It is no doubt true that if there was any provision to be found in impugned Act which prevented the Wage Board from giving reasons for its decision, it might be construed to mean that ....
The main legal point established is the requirement for providing reasons for decisions, as it is essential for clarity and fairness in the judicial process.
Administrative authorities must provide clear reasons for decisions affecting rights to ensure fairness and prevent arbitrariness.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
