Back
SAURABH LAVANIA
Shashi Devi Sachan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Advocate alongwith Sri Akshat Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State counsel and Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No. 5. Other private opposite parties, as stated by Sri Verma, are formal parties.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 23.10.2021 passed by the respondent No. 4/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sarojni Nagar, Lucknow on an application instituted under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short “Code of 2006”) registered as Case No. 13504/2021, Computerized Case No. T202110460513504 (Bhola vs. Smt. Shashi Devi and others) and the order dated 06.10.2022 passed by respondent No. 3/Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow in Appeal No. 1757/2021, Computerized Case No. C202110000001757 (Smt. Shashi Devi and others vs. Bhola and others) instituted under Section 24(4) of the Code of 2006 as also the order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the respondent No. 2/Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow in Revision No. REV/2563/2022/Lucknow, Computerized Case No. R20221046002563 (Smt. Shashi Devi Sachan and
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide reasoned and speaking orders to ensure transparency and prevent arbitrary decision-making.
A quasi-judicial authority must provide a reasoned order to ensure transparency and accountability in decision-making.
Quasi-judicial authorities must record detailed reasons for decisions, ensuring procedural fairness and preventing arbitrary action.
The necessity of providing reasons in appellate decisions is crucial for ensuring judicial accountability, transparency, and fairness.
It is a settled legal proposition that not only administrative but also judicial order must be supported by reasons, recorded in it. Thus, while deciding an issue, the Court is bound to give reasons ....
Judicial proceedings must follow prescribed procedures; failure to document and hear parties leads to invalid orders, undermining public trust in the justice system.
Point of Law : It is no doubt true that if there was any provision to be found in impugned Act which prevented the Wage Board from giving reasons for its decision, it might be construed to mean that ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
