JUDGMENT :

S. Manikumar, J.

Being aggrieved by the judgment in W. P. (C) No. 8201 of 2010 dated 23.07.2021, setting aside Ext. P14 order of the Commissioner of Land Revenue, Thiruvananthapuram, dated 28.01.2010, and further directions, instant writ appeal is filed.

2. Short judgment impugned in this appeal are as hereunder:

“2. After a series of litigation, 1st respondent passed Ext.P14 order. Short point raised by the petitioner before this Court is that, as per Ext.P14 order, the Commissioner of Land Revenue disposed a revision by a non speaking order in the following manner:

“The eligibility of Sri.Koran stands unquestioned and the revision petition is allowed.”

3. According to me, this is not the way an order to be passed by the Revisional Authority. It is true that the facts are narrated previous to this part of order. There is no discussion and there is no application of mind. It is stated in the penultimate paragraph of the order that after hearing the Junior Superintendent at the Taluk Office, Hosdurg Taluk, it is found that the 2nd respondent Sri. Koran is eligible for the said assignment while the 1st respondent Sri. Krishna Bhat is having four acres of land of his own, and is