SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2710

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.
Chhangur Kushwaha - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Respondents
Application U/s 482 No. 42245 of 2024
Decided On : 06-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ajay Bahadur Yadav, Sanjeev Yadav

Judicial officers must apply their minds when passing orders; mechanical orders on printed proformas are unsustainable.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of proceedings - Application filed to quash the order summoning the accused in a criminal case due to lack of judicial application in the order passed on a printed proforma - The Magistrate's mechanical approach in filling out the proforma without applying judicial mind renders the order unsustainable. (Paras 2, 4, 8)

(B) Judicial Mind - The necessity for a Magistrate to apply judicial mind when passing orders is emphasized, and orders passed mechanically are disapproved by the court. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought to quash the proceedings of a criminal case where the summoning order was issued on a printed proforma, lacking any substantial reasoning or judicial application. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the order passed by the Magistrate was mechanical and did not reflect any application of judicial mind, which is essential in judicial proceedings. (Paras 8, 10)

Issues: The main issue was whether the order summoning the accused was valid considering it was made on a printed proforma without proper judicial reasoning. (Paras 4, 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that judicial officers must apply their minds when passing orders, and mechanical orders are inadequate and unsustainable. (Paras 8, 10)

Result: The application is allowed, and the impugned order is quashed, directing the Magistrate to pass a fresh order after applying judicial mind.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.

1. Heard, Sri Ajay Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Ladly Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 2717 of 2020 (State Vs. Chhangur Kushwaha) arising out of Case Crime No. 431 of 2018, under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of I.P.C., at Police Station Hata, District Kushinagar, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 31.07.2020 pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar.

3. While assailing the impugned order, contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that learned Magistrate has not applied judicial mind in passing the order as the order has been made on a printed proforma, in which the name of the accused, case crime number and Section has been filled up by hand.

4. Relying upon the decision of this Court in Ankit Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2010 (1) JIC 432, submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the order impugned being on a printed proforma is clearly without application of judicial mind and hence, is liable to be quashed on this ground alone.

5. Learned A.G.A. has also admitted that the order impugned has been passed on the printed proforma and therefore, keeping in view the decision in the case of Ankit (supra), it may be directed to pass a fresh order.

6. I have considered the arguments so advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and also perused the record.

7. The certified copy of the order summoning the accused has been appended as Annexure-1 at page-17 of the paper book. From a perusal of the above order, it is evident that it is a typed proforma where only information of case number, name of parties, section, date and next date is to be filled by Magistrate in handwriting. It appears that the blanks in the printed proforma have been filled up by some court employee and the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar has thereafter just put his initial, which leads to the conclusion that the Magistrate has passed the order in a mechanical manner without application of judicial mind.

8. Despite there being a series of decisions of the Apex Court and this Court disapproving such practice of passing orders on printed proforma by the judicial officers, it is very painful and unfortunate to see that applicant in the present case has been summoned by the Magistrate by an order in which blanks have been filled in on a printed proforma without applying judicial mind. This type of order has already been held unsustainable by this Court in the case of Ankit (supra) relying on in a number of decisions of the Apex Court. The relevant portion of the said decision, is extracted below:

"8. ...Although as held by this Court in the case of Megh Nath Guptas & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. And Anr. 2008 (62) ACC 826, in which reference has been made to the cases of Deputy Chief Controller Import and Export Vs. Roshan Lal Agarwal, 2003 (4) ACC 686 (SC), U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Mohan Meakins, 2000 (2) JIC 159 (SC) : AIR 2000 SC 1456 and Kanti Bhadra Vs. State of West Bengal, 2000 (1) JIC 751 (SC) : 2000 (40) ACC 441 (SC), the Magistrate is not required to pass detailed reasoned order at the time of taking cognizance on the charge sheet, but it does not mean that order of taking cognizance can be passed by filling up the blanks on printed proforma. At the time of passing any judicial order including the order taking cognizance on the charge sheet, the Court is required to apply judicial mind and even the order of taking cognizance cannot be passed in mechanical manner. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed and the matter has to be sent back to the Court below for passing fresh order on the charge sheet after applying judicial mind."

9. In view of the above, the conduct of the judicial officers concerned in passing orders on printed proforma by filling up

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top