Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Abdul Moin
Arpit Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Chief General Manager State Bank Of India Lucknow – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of appointment based on discrepancies. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claim of no signature/thump impression during examination. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. violation of natural justice denied due to clarity of evidence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. reliance on forensic expert's report strengthens case. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. expert reports can outrank claims of natural justice in fraud cases. (Para 24 , 34 , 40) |
| 6. arguments based on alleged procedural violations are insufficient against clear evidence. (Para 28) |
| 7. impersonation established through forensic evidence impacts employment validation. (Para 39) |
| 8. writ petition dismissed based on established facts. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Abdul Moin, J.
1. Heard.
2. Under challenge is the order dated 12.08.2013, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the selection of the petitioner on the post of Assistant in State Bank of India has been cancelled and the offer of appointment has been revoked/cancelled.
3. Bereft of unnecessary details, facts of the case as set forth by the petitioner are that the petitioner had appeared in a examination for the clerical cadre in State Bank of India. The written examination took place on 27.05
Impersonation in appointment processes justifies the cancellation of an appointment without notice if evidence conclusively points to fraud, as affirmed by forensic analysis and existing legal preced....
A recruitment process cannot dismiss candidates based solely on inconclusive expert opinions without granting procedural fairness, highlighting the importance of societal norms regarding name discrep....
The court upheld the rejection of the applicant's candidature based on expert opinion regarding handwriting mismatch, affirming that natural justice does not guarantee specific procedures if fairness....
Disciplinary proceedings based solely on expert opinion without supporting evidence violate natural justice and cannot sustain dismissal.
The reliance on expert handwriting opinion in disciplinary actions requires substantial corroboration, failing which charge sheets can be quashed due to procedural irregularities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
