SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3091

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANISH KUMAR NIGAM
Sammohit @ Sammohit – Appellant
Versus
Raju Kumar Patel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Harish Chandra Dwivedi

JUDGMENT :

MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26.08.2025 passed by Additional District Judge/Special Judge, Court No. 4, Varanasi in Misc. Case No. 51 of 2025. By the order dated 26.08.2025, the appellate court has allowed the application filed by the appellant for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.

3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent has not filed the application for condoning the delay along with memo of appeal and therefore, in view of the provisions of Order 41 Rule 3-A C.P.C., the appeal filed by the respondent is to be dismissed. It has also been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in case, an appeal is filed with delay, the same shall be accompanied by an application for condoning the delay in view of the provisions of Order 41 Rule 3-A C.P.C. It has been further contended that subsequent to the filing of the appeal, an application cannot be filed for condoning the delay, it has to be filed simultaneously along with memo of appeal. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top