Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Krishna Kant – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Prem Prakash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 and Mr. Hare Ram, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
2. The present writ petition challenges the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 04.07.2025 passed by respondent no. 2, whereby the petitioner's appointment has been declared void ab initio with effect from the date of appointment, i.e., 31.03.1998.
3. The brief facts relevant for the purpose of the present case are that:-
(i) Earlier, the petitioner was terminated from service on 20.12.2021, without initiating any disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to a complaint lodged by Smt. Snehlata. The petitioner challenged the said termination order before this Court by means of filing Writ-A No.1254 of 2022, wherein by an interim order dated 15.02.2022, relief was granted in favor of the petitioner. Subsequently, the writ petition was allowed by order dated 06.03.2024, with a direction for p
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
