HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
AMITABH KUMAR RAI
Mohd. Arif – Appellant
Versus
U.P. State Road Transport Corp. Through Its M.D. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard Sri Sameer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31.05.2002 passed by the Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘UPSRTC’) Lucknow Region, Lucknow, whereby the petitioner was awarded punishment of removal from service, as well as the appellate order dated 10.09.2002 by which the appeal of the petitioner was rejected by respondent no. 3, Mandaliya Pradhan Prabandhak (Central Zone), UPSRTC, Terhi Kothi, Lucknow.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, while posted on the post of Conductor at Mirzapur Depot, Allahabad Region, was running passenger bus bearing vehicle registration no. U.R.S. 9938 en route from Renukot to Lucknow on 09.03.1990. At about 16:45 hours, between Renukot and Robertsganj, the bus was stopped by the inspection team at a place namely Gurmura, and on inspection it was found that out of 83 passengers, 30 passengers were without tickets, though the fare from them was realised by the petitioner. The inspection team was head

State of A.P. v. S. Sree Rama Rao
High Court of Bombay v. Shashikant S. Patil
The court affirmed that disciplinary proceedings followed appropriate regulations and natural justice principles, validating the removal of an employee for misconduct in ticket issuance.
The court upheld that procedural irregularities in domestic enquiries do not invalidate findings if substantiated by evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review against disciplinary ac....
The court upheld the dismissal of an employee based on sufficient evidence in a domestic enquiry, affirming that procedural fairness does not require the same strict standards as formal court proceed....
The court upheld the dismissal of the employee, affirming that hearsay evidence is permissible in domestic enquiries and that the disciplinary authority can conduct the enquiry without inherent preju....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing and the requirement for oral evidence. Failure to comply renders the proceedings and resul....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and proven charges, adherence to procedural rules, and consideration of the petitioner's explanation in disciplinary proceedings.
The court emphasized that charges of misconduct must be supported by substantial evidence and that the prescribed procedures must be followed. The court also highlighted the principle that the punish....
The Disciplinary Authority must issue a reasoned notice of disagreement when departing from exonerating findings in disciplinary proceedings, ensuring the principles of natural justice are upheld.
Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited to process legality; evidence evaluation remains within the disciplinary authority's purview.
Judicial review in disciplinary proceedings is limited to procedural legality; the Tribunal cannot substitute its own judgment unless findings are perverse.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.