SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 764

LOK PAL SINGH
PAPPU ALIAS PUSHKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Revisionist :Mr. Devesh Upreti, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Rathore and Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, A.G.A

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Lok Pal Singh, J.

This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 02.08.2013 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat in Criminal Case No.174 of 2013 State vs. Pappu alias Pushkar Singh and another, whereby the accused-revisionists have been convicted u/s 452 of I.P.C. and have been convicted sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of one year alongwith a fine of Rs. 500/-. They have further directed u/s 323 of IPC and have been sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of six months along with a fine of Rs.500/- each. In default of payment of fine, the revisionists have to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. They have been further convicted under Section 504 & 506 of I.P.C. and have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 500/- each in each Section. In default of payment of fine, the revisionists have to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. The court below directed that all the sentences were directed to run concurrently. The accused/revisionists also challenged the judgment and order dated 29.11.2014 passed by learned District and Sessions J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top