Back
2023 Supreme(UK) 132
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Pitresh Bhatt - Appellant
Versus
Prof. Annpurna Nautiyal - Respondent
Contempt Petition No. 483 of 2018
Decided On : 12-01-2023
Irum Zeba, Advocate
The rejection of the petitioner's representation led to the disposal of the contempt petition.
Headnote:
Contempt - Representation Rejection - The court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous based on the rejection of the petitioner's representation.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's representation dated 19.09.2017 was considered and rejected on 27.08.2019.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous.
Issues: None
Ratio Decidendi: The rejection of the petitioner's representation led to the disposal of the contempt petition.
Final Decision: The contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out.
2. Counsel for the respondent submits that in terms of order dated 08.09.2017, rendered in Writ Petition (S/B) No. 405 of 2017, the petitioner made his representation dated 19.09.2017, which has been considered, and rejected on 27.08.2019. The rejection order has been tendered by counsel for the respondent, which is taken on record.
3. In the light of the aforesaid, present contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.
