SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Pitresh Bhatt - Appellant
Versus
Prof. Annpurna Nautiyal - Respondent
Contempt Petition No. 483 of 2018
Decided On : 12-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Irum Zeba, Advocate

The rejection of the petitioner's representation led to the disposal of the contempt petition.

Headnote:

Contempt - Representation Rejection - The court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous based on the rejection of the petitioner's representation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's representation dated 19.09.2017 was considered and rejected on 27.08.2019.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous.

Issues: None

Ratio Decidendi: The rejection of the petitioner's representation led to the disposal of the contempt petition.

Final Decision: The contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out.

2. Counsel for the respondent submits that in terms of order dated 08.09.2017, rendered in Writ Petition (S/B) No. 405 of 2017, the petitioner made his representation dated 19.09.2017, which has been considered, and rejected on 27.08.2019. The rejection order has been tendered by counsel for the respondent, which is taken on record.

3. In the light of the aforesaid, present contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top