SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 779

S.S.JHA, P.C.AGARWAL
Sachish Chandra Jain – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K.Shukla, K.L.Mangal, R.D.Jain, Sangam Jain,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed in First Appeal No. 10 of 1982 arising out of the judgment and decree dated 19-6-82 passed by Third Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior.

( 2. ) OBJECTION is raised by the respondents as to maintainability. The appeal was finally heard and decided on 4-9-96 [1997 (1) Vidhi Bhasvar 255]. After its decision an application for restoration was filed as some of the respondents were not served and appeal came up for hearing. After restoration of appeal the case was listed again and objection is raised that in view of amendment in Section 100-A of Code of Civil Procedure this appeal is not maintainable. This appeal is filed against that order.

( 3. ) IT is to be examined whether the appeal is now maintainable in view of amended Section 100-A of Code of Civil Procedure came into force w. e. f. 1st July, 2002. Section 100-A is reproduced below:-

"100-A. No further appeal in certain cases.-- Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent for any High Court or in any instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force, where any appeal from an ori









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top