SUJOY PAUL
Satish Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujoy Paul, J.
Heard on admission.
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
(b) An appropriate writ order or direction quashing Second Enquiry Report dt. 02/12/2020.
(c) An appropriate writ order or direction quashing charge sheet dt. 03/01/2021 so far as it relates to petitioner.
(d) An appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondent concern to put on hold the departmental enquiry till the final completion of the trial pending before the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Act.
(e) An appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondent concern to pass reasoned order on the reply filed by the petitioner.
(f) An appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondent concern to pass reasoned and speaking order on the reply dt. 08/01/2021 filed by petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised two fault submissions:-
Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board v. Ramesh Kumar Singh
Jagdish Baheti Vs. High Court of M.P. & Ors.
Sawai Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha
Special Director v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse
State of Orissa v. Sangram Keshari Misra
State of U.P v. Brahm Datt Sharma
State of U.P. Vs. Mohd. Sharif (dead) through LRs.
Ulagappa v. Divisional Commissioner, Mysore
Ulagappa v. Divn. Commr., Mysore
Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
Union of India v. Upendra Singh
Zenit Mataplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2009) 10 SCC 388
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.