SANDEEP SHARMA
Shyam Lal Tomar Sonof Late Sh. Sant Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Principal Secretary (Home) To The Government Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 26.2.2021 passed by Director-General of Police, Himachal Pradesh, whereby he though upheld the order dated 4.1.2020 passed by IGP Southern Range, Shimla whereby punishment of permanent forfeiture of three years of service passed by Superintendent of Police 31.1.2020 was upheld but taking lenient view modified the punishment of permanent forfeiture of three years to 1 year of service, petitioner has approached this court in the instant proceedings filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, praying therein for following relief.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that in the year 2019, while petitioner was posted as Station House Officer Police Station Parwanoo, a case FIR No. 12, dated 12.1.2019, under S. 307, 323, 506 and 34 IPC was registered on the complaint of one Shri Sukhvinder S
Kuldeep Singh versus Commissioner of Police and others
Nand Kishore vs. State of Bihar
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Rama Rao. 1964 (2) LLJ 150
Central Bank of India vs. Prakash Chand Jain
Bharat Iron Works vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & Ors. (1976) 1 SCC 518
Rajinder Kumar Kindra vs. Delhi Administration through Secretary (Labour) and Others
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and others (2009) 2 SCC 570
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.