SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 305

SUJOY PAUL
Kamlesh Goud – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Akshat Pahadia, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Aditya Garg, Learned G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Sujoy Paul, J.

1. Learned counsel for petitioner at the outset fairly submits that this matter is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in WP No. 2027/2021. Thus, petitioner deserves same fate.

2. Shri Aditya Garg, learned G.A. has no objection.

3. This Court in WP No. 2027/2021 opined as under:-

    "7. The following allegations are made against the petitioner:-

^^1- fcuk ofj"B vf/kdkfj;ksa dks voxr djk, Lo;a ds inLFkkiuk okys Fkkus ls nhxj Fkkuk c/kkuk {ks= esa tkdj ,uMhih,l dh dk;Zokgh dj lacaf/kr Fkkuk ÁHkkjh dks lwfpr u dj e/;Áns'k iqfyl jsX;qys'ku ds iSjk Øa- 64 ¼3½ mYya?ku djuk ,oa iSjk Øa- 719 ¼d½ esa fu/kkZfjr Áko/kkuksa dk ikyu ugha djukA

2- mijksDr lwpuk ij iwNrkN gsrq v{k; xks;y dks lacf/kr Fkkuk c?kkuk ;k inLFkkiuk okys Fkkuk tkon u ys tkrs gq, lq;qDr dCts okys ¼fdjk;s ij½ galk ekyoh; ds edku esa j[k lansgkLin vkpj.k dk Án'kZu dj e/;Áns'k iqfyl jsX;qysn'ku ds iSjk Øa- 64 ¼2½ dk mYya?ku djukA

3- mijksDr ,uMhih,l ,DV esa iwNrkN gsrq v{k; xks;y dks ys tkus ds mijkar v{k; xks;y ds ifjtuksa }kjk vigj.k dh vk'kadk ds pyrs Fkkuk uhep dsaV esa ntZ xqebZlku Ø- 47@20 ds lanHkZ esa Fkkuk ÁHkkjh uhep dsaV Jh vt; lkjoku }kjk bl laca/k esa iwNs tkus ij v{k; xks;y ds laca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top