SUJOY PAUL
Kamlesh Goud – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujoy Paul, J.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner at the outset fairly submits that this matter is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in WP No. 2027/2021. Thus, petitioner deserves same fate.
2. Shri Aditya Garg, learned G.A. has no objection.
3. This Court in WP No. 2027/2021 opined as under:-
^^1- fcuk ofj"B vf/kdkfj;ksa dks voxr djk, Lo;a ds inLFkkiuk okys Fkkus ls nhxj Fkkuk c/kkuk {ks= esa tkdj ,uMhih,l dh dk;Zokgh dj lacaf/kr Fkkuk ÁHkkjh dks lwfpr u dj e/;Áns'k iqfyl jsX;qys'ku ds iSjk Øa- 64 ¼3½ mYya?ku djuk ,oa iSjk Øa- 719 ¼d½ esa fu/kkZfjr Áko/kkuksa dk ikyu ugha djukA
2- mijksDr lwpuk ij iwNrkN gsrq v{k; xks;y dks lacf/kr Fkkuk c?kkuk ;k inLFkkiuk okys Fkkuk tkon u ys tkrs gq, lq;qDr dCts okys ¼fdjk;s ij½ galk ekyoh; ds edku esa j[k lansgkLin vkpj.k dk Án'kZu dj e/;Áns'k iqfyl jsX;qysn'ku ds iSjk Øa- 64 ¼2½ dk mYya?ku djukA
3- mijksDr ,uMhih,l ,DV esa iwNrkN gsrq v{k; xks;y dks ys tkus ds mijkar v{k; xks;y ds ifjtuksa }kjk vigj.k dh vk'kadk ds pyrs Fkkuk uhep dsaV esa ntZ xqebZlku Ø- 47@20 ds lanHkZ esa Fkkuk ÁHkkjh uhep dsaV Jh vt; lkjoku }kjk bl laca/k esa iwNs tkus ij v{k; xks;y ds laca
Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board v. Ramesh Kumar Singh
Jagdish Baheti Vs. High Court of M.P. & Ors.
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha
Special Director v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse
State of Orissa v. Sangram Keshari Misra
State of U.P v. Brahm Datt Sharma
Ulagappa v. Divisional Commissioner, Mysore
Ulagappa v. Divn. Commr., Mysore
Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
Union of India v. Upendra Singh
Zenit Mataplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2009) 10 SCC 388
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.